And I'm sure that Rafa wouldn't have minded if they kept the USO on clay. There is really no "moot point" in tennis arguments across generations. And you've already admitted that dominating a Major gives extra points, in your opinion, so you "appreciate" world domination, wherever it comes from, even if it makes your blood boil.
:lulz2: Fair enough. I still don't think Wimbledon is gearing up for a name change soon on their trophy, but I do think they could give him the life-size version like the RG one that Nadal got. They usually get a little one.
OK, I'm not sure how I was supposed to jump to that, and now I'd don't feel so dumb.
Thanks for the clarification. Since everyone is feeling so generous today, I also don't think it will seem sour to point out that Rafa has the higher winning pct. on his preferred surface. We'll take our advantages where they come. 
I don't make you feel that you need to defend yourself. You give credit where it is due. I was speaking general purposes about my making the claim on such a Fedfan holiday. I get your point about smaller statistical options on grass, but clay is a 3x longer season, with many clay specialists lurking, as opposed to grass, where there are relatively few. Also, the top players only tend to play each other in 1 event on grass, whereas they usually play 2-3 MS and RG on clay, so the quality of competition is better, in the aggregate.
