What the hell is talent?

monfed

Major Winner
Joined
Apr 28, 2018
Messages
2,112
Reactions
506
Points
113
My word, talent does become greater or lesser....you ever heard someone saying a player is more talented than he was? Clear bs is stupider than ever...:D

And he questions about others comprehension, while telling us that talent is ‘developed’ bhahahaha

If you drink from the fountain of talent you will become talented. The more you drink the more talented you become...:D
 
Last edited:

brokenshoelace

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
9,380
Reactions
1,334
Points
113
Develop my arse.... talent can be either spotted or not, one may have a chance to apply or not, but develop? Shut the fuk up

HAHAHAH this motherfucking moron is seriously arguing that you don't develop your talent. You just "spot" it.

Hey let me ask you a question, you fucking idiot:

When Roger Federer picked up a racket for literally the first time in his life: Do you think he fired forehand winners the first time he took a swing at the ball or do you think he developed his forehand through practice?

No, honestly, even by your insanely stupid standards, this is beyond ridiculous. Do you honestly manage to go through routine daily activities being this fucking moronic or is that why you're so angry all the time?
 

Double Bagel

Masters Champion
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
565
Reactions
157
Points
43
Age
47
Location
USA/MD
Exactly. Except what he's referring to is people who supposedly have Federer like talent but never pick a tennis racket. If you're born into a family similar to the one you describe, chances are you'll pick up a racket.
Most likely you would think a tennis family would encourage a child to play the game. For me and I don't have the talent like any of the professionals, but I can hold my own on the court my parents were also avid tennis players, but they made me a well rounded kid. They exposed me to not only tennis, but also soccer, softball, piano, dance and academics were always the top priority in my house.
 

Ricardo

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
2,674
Reactions
646
Points
113
HAHAHAH this motherfucking moron is seriously arguing that you don't develop your talent. You just "spot" it.

Hey let me ask you a question, you fucking idiot:

When Roger Federer picked up a racket for literally the first time in his life: Do you think he fired forehand winners the first time he took a swing at the ball or do you think he developed his forehand through practice?

No, honestly, even by your insanely stupid standards, this is beyond ridiculous. Do you honestly manage to go through routine daily activities being this fucking moronic or is that why you're so angry all the time?
Learn to read, I said ...or have a chance to apply, which means it’s always there but we can see it if it’s applied. The point is, this innate ability is always there, not developed you dumb ass, ever hear anyone saying ‘hey this guy used to be talented but not any more’, or ‘he is more talented now than ever, after developing whatever’....stop arguing, the more you do the more idiocy you show.

Get back to the couch, you small fat potato.
 

brokenshoelace

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
9,380
Reactions
1,334
Points
113
Learn to read, I said ...or have a chance to apply, which means it’s always there but we can see it if it’s applied. The point is, this innate ability is always there, not developed you dumb ass, ever hear anyone saying ‘hey this guy used to be talented but not any more’, or ‘he is more talented now than ever, after developing whatever’....stop arguing, the more you do the more idiocy you show.

Get back to the couch, you small fat potato.

I never said talent goes away. What the fuck is wrong with you? I said you DEVELOP it.
 

Ricardo

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
2,674
Reactions
646
Points
113
I never said talent goes away. What the fuck is wrong with you? I said you DEVELOP it.
You are never going to be more talented than before, that’s what the fuck is wrong with you.

Does anyone ever become talented? Bhahahaha
 

brokenshoelace

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
9,380
Reactions
1,334
Points
113
You are never going to be more talented than before, that’s what the fuck is wrong with you.

Does anyone ever become talented? Bhahahaha

You DEVELOP talent. You don’t become more talented. You take the talent and build on it.

Is English not your second language? I say second because clearly retard is your first.
 

Ricardo

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
2,674
Reactions
646
Points
113
You DEVELOP talent. You don’t become more talented. You take the talent and build on it.

Is English not your second language? I say second because clearly retard is your first.
Talent does not increase or decrease, its not developed dumb ass.
 

MikeOne

Masters Champion
Joined
Sep 29, 2015
Messages
658
Reactions
484
Points
63
Mike, this latest Djokovic-Wawrinka match is more proof of what I have said about Djokovic's weaknesses in terms of offensive shotmaking. It does not come to him as naturally as it does to Federer or it did to Nalbandian.

Nalbandian had his problems but he would never lose to someone the way Djokovic has repeatedly lost to Wawrinka, i.e. for not having enough firepower to hit through the court against a big hitter and getting flattened in rallies. Nalbandian lost to people for other reasons than that.

he retired, we don't know exactly if he retired for reason or used it as an excuse. Wawrinka can dominate anyone when he's in form, he would've probably destroyed Nalbandian. Remember, Blake OWNED Nadalbandian and Blake was similar to wawrinka - BIG powerful strokes. If Blake OWNED Nalbandian, Wawrinka probably would've OWNED Nalbandian too. I already showed you how Blake exposed Nalbandian by overpowering him...

Blake vs Nalbandian - Blake 2-0

Wawrinka vs Djokovic - Djokovic 19-5


whilst it's true Stan has given Djoker problems, the h2h is still 19-5 in favor of Djokovic, 19-5 is domination if you ask me.

and this is just match-ups. Djokovic regularly bashes Nadal with offense. yet he can't do the same to Medvedev but Nadal can. Similarly, Djokovic can't outhit Stan but can outhit Nadal and Nadal can outhit Stan. Look at what Nadal did to Stan at FO and what Stan did to Djoker at FO. How does that make sense? How can player A outhit player B, who can outhit player C yet player C can outhit player A? It's styles. Players have different patterns that when they mix, produces interesting results. The reason Djokovic can regularly outhit Federer, Nadal off the baseline and hit a ton of winners again them (see Novak's domination of Fed at AO, and domination of Nadal on many matches) is because he is able to force short balls from them, then he hits winners. Stan has an ability to hit everything hard, even from defensive positions so he gives Djokovic less to work with. Djokovic can get many more short balls from Fed, Nadal when he attacks them and often bullies them off the baseline.

Again, it's match-ups. Take Medvedev, Djoker and Nadal. Why can Djokovic blast Nadal off the court, can't so same to Medvedev and yet Nadal blast Medvedev off the court? patterns..

Stan's patterns give Novak trouble, just match-up but it's still 19-5!!!!!!
 
Last edited: