US Politics Thread

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,273
Reactions
7,552
Points
113
IDK why people are surprised that Trump over-promised (as usual) & he's now having to deal w/ the fall-out! When his actions (or inactions) are defended, they look more & more unhinged! Regret is on the minds of a lot of these Trump-ster, but that won't help us survive the rest of this very new term! :astonished-face::angry-face::fearful-face::anxious-face-with-sweat:
What? That he’s trying to bring both sides together to talk, instead of spending billions of your dollars to increase the fighting?
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,901
Reactions
15,070
Points
113
Putin has made a monkey out of the west for 25 years. Pumping dollars into potentially expanding the war hasn’t worked, nor did handing him Crimea on a silver platter in 2014. It’s hard to see an end to this, without more suffering and pain. A heart attack might help but then we have the old Soviet Union conundrum - who comes next?
I don't think that's quite the point I'm making. Trump has opened his arms wide to Putin, for years. But now it's not just the bromance. Trump has staked some of his political capital on ending that war, and Putin refuses to kiss him back, even though Trump has gift wrapped the pkg. I just wonder if the Prez will have the sense to be insulted. He's generally pretty thin-skinned.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,273
Reactions
7,552
Points
113
I don't think that's quite the point I'm making. Trump has opened his arms wide to Putin, for years. But now it's not just the bromance. Trump has staked some of his political capital on ending that war, and Putin refuses to kiss him back, even though Trump has gift wrapped the pkg. I just wonder if the Prez will have the sense to be insulted. He's generally pretty thin-skinned.
It's often difficult to read Trump, based on that he says a lot of nonsense that we have to ignore, and filter etc. I think his base instinct is to be against war, for probably good reasons. War is always a missed opportunity and yet successive American presidents have ended up in wars, increased their wars, whereas I don't sense from him a bullishness or eagerness, in that regard.

But still we have to filter him, and see what he's doing. He's put an offer on the table and Putin rejected it. That wasn't unexpected. It's how people negotiate, although these are highest stakes. Putin has people behind him too, watching like hawks to see what he does. He was hardly going to immediately do what America insists upon. There's a next stage that follows, and that's also part of the filtering. You maybe right about what happens next, but worse case scenario is only what's happened under every other president, more or less, since the end of the Cold War. Trump may surprise us - hopefully!

Also hopefully he won't rise to the bait and feel insulted...
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,901
Reactions
15,070
Points
113
It's often difficult to read Trump, based on that he says a lot of nonsense that we have to ignore, and filter etc. I think his base instinct is to be against war, for probably good reasons. War is always a missed opportunity and yet successive American presidents have ended up in wars, increased their wars, whereas I don't sense from him a bullishness or eagerness, in that regard.

But still we have to filter him, and see what he's doing. He's put an offer on the table and Putin rejected it. That wasn't unexpected. It's how people negotiate, although these are highest stakes. Putin has people behind him too, watching like hawks to see what he does. He was hardly going to immediately do what America insists upon. There's a next stage that follows, and that's also part of the filtering. You maybe right about what happens next, but worse case scenario is only what's happened under every other president, more or less, since the end of the Cold War. Trump may surprise us - hopefully!

Also hopefully he won't rise to the bait and feel insulted...
Trump's disinclination to war is that he feels like the US ends up fighting other peoples' wars, and spending its money on them, which he thinks is for chumps. It's certainly not his deep concern for greater humanity, as he has none. All of his motivations are transactional...'what does it do for me?'

He also has no skill at, nor care for diplomacy. His approach to peace in Ukraine is based on completely rewriting history, and so, a lie. ("Zelenskyy is a dictator; Ukraine started the war.") He's reversing decades of US policy towards Russia as a non-democratic regime, betraying our interests and our allies. @Federberg has rightly expressed a lot of anxiety over the fate of NATO given Trump's policies. What he wants out of this negotiation is to fulfill a brag he made about it the electorate, to keep Ukraine out of NATO and further hobble it, and to suck up to his friend the dictator, Putin. I don't know why you would treat this like some normal negotiation, since it never has been. And I'm very curious to know who you think Putin answers to back home.

Trump promised an end to the war in a day. He can't even get a proper cease-fire. Personally, I'm still curious to know how Trump reacts to Putin making this a pissing contest.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,273
Reactions
7,552
Points
113
Trump's disinclination to war is that he feels like the US ends up fighting other peoples' wars, and spending its money on them, which he thinks is for chumps. It's certainly not his deep concern for greater humanity, as he has none. All of his motivations are transactional...'what does it do for me?'

He also has no skill at, nor care for diplomacy. His approach to peace in Ukraine is based on completely rewriting history, and so, a lie. ("Zelenskyy is a dictator; Ukraine started the war.") He's reversing decades of US policy towards Russia as a non-democratic regime, betraying our interests and our allies. @Federberg has rightly expressed a lot of anxiety over the fate of NATO given Trump's policies. What he wants out of this negotiation is to fulfill a brag he made about it the electorate, to keep Ukraine out of NATO and further hobble it, and to suck up to his friend the dictator, Putin. I don't know why you would treat this like some normal negotiation, since it never has been. And I'm very curious to know who you think Putin answers to back home.

Trump promised an end to the war in a day. He can't even get a proper cease-fire. Personally, I'm still curious to know how Trump reacts to Putin making this a pissing contest.
He shouldn’t react to Putin making it a pissing contest, that’s not how you negotiate. He has to focus on the goal he set himself, which is to end the war. Ignore Putin’s boorish behaviour, his lateness to the meeting etc. Putin began this war and relative to what he wanted, it’s gone badly for him. He needs peace.

I didn’t say Putin answers to anybody in Russia. He also doesn’t care about Russia but there are always would-be tyrants eyeing up the crown. We’ve known this since time out of mind. No dictator can be unaware of the usual fate of dictators.

As for the rest of it, I don’t disagree with much of it. Obviously I could point again to Obama and his weakness and lacking understanding, in the face of Russia, and also the way the west poodle-like handed over Crimea in 2014, led in that enterprise by the French and Germans, and watched over by America.

I’m not saying this to score points or start arguments, this is history by now, but the west has not always been strong or clear in its dealings with Russia, since the break up of the USSR. Putin sensed weakness and went full invasion into Ukraine. He lied about the reasons, naturally, pretending it was about Ukraine wanting to join NATO - seemingly Finland actually joining NATO was okay with him.

If Trump fails to bring peace - and when dealing with rats like Putin, it’s unlikely to succeed - we are going to have to face a further prolonged war that might expand into neighbouring countries anyway…
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,901
Reactions
15,070
Points
113
He shouldn’t react to Putin making it a pissing contest, that’s not how you negotiate. He has to focus on the goal he set himself, which is to end the war. Ignore Putin’s boorish behaviour, his lateness to the meeting etc. Putin began this war and relative to what he wanted, it’s gone badly for him. He needs peace.

I didn’t say Putin answers to anybody in Russia. He also doesn’t care about Russia but there are always would-be tyrants eyeing up the crown. We’ve known this since time out of mind. No dictator can be unaware of the usual fate of dictators.

As for the rest of it, I don’t disagree with much of it. Obviously I could point again to Obama and his weakness and lacking understanding, in the face of Russia, and also the way the west poodle-like handed over Crimea in 2014, led in that enterprise by the French and Germans, and watched over by America.

I’m not saying this to score points or start arguments, this is history by now, but the west has not always been strong or clear in its dealings with Russia, since the break up of the USSR. Putin sensed weakness and went full invasion into Ukraine. He lied about the reasons, naturally, pretending it was about Ukraine wanting to join NATO - seemingly Finland actually joining NATO was okay with him.

If Trump fails to bring peace - and when dealing with rats like Putin, it’s unlikely to succeed - we are going to have to face a further prolonged war that might expand into neighbouring countries anyway…
I think they've stacked the deck against Ukraine, but I hope that somehow they can come up with a solution to end the war, stop the killing, and leave Ukraine with its territory intact, and also its ability to make sovereign decisions, such as whether or not it wants to join NATO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kieran

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,273
Reactions
7,552
Points
113
I think they've stacked the deck against Ukraine, but I hope that somehow they can come up with a solution to end the war, stop the killing, and leave Ukraine with its territory intact, and also its ability to make sovereign decisions, such as whether or not it wants to join NATO.
Totally agree, though I don’t see them being able to reverse the 2014 disgrace of handing to Putin Crimea…
 

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
15,700
Reactions
5,767
Points
113
Copied-:

Written by someone named Mark Pitt...

Trump will not last his full term. Not because of elections. Not because
of scandals. But because he has done the one thing no leader can do and survive: he has made himself bigger than the machine that created him.

The Ukraine meeting wasn’t just a blunder—it was a declaration of war, not against a foreign nation, but against the very order that keeps leaders in power and ensures their safety. He has done what no American president has done before—shaken the world’s foundations in a way that even his allies cannot ignore. NATO isn’t just a military alliance; it is the thread that has held global power together since 1945. And he is snapping it, strand by strand.

The system is patient, but it is not merciful. There are men whose names will never be known, whose influence is never written about, but who determine which presidents rise—and which ones fall. These men do not forgive. They do not warn. They do not lose. And Trump, for all his bravado, for all his victories, is stepping into a space where there is no precedent but one—what happens when a leader becomes too great a threat to the equilibrium.

His inner circle is not a government; it is a fortress of the damned, filled with men and women who stay close out of necessity, out of fear, out of the knowledge that when the end comes, proximity might mean survival. But history is unkind to emperors without an empire. The purges, the firings, the dismantling of the security apparatus—this isn’t a reformer cleaning house. This is a man sawing off the very branch he sits on. And when it breaks, there will be no one left to catch him.

At 79, Trump is no longer playing for policy or power. He is playing for immortality. He has won every battle, defied every expectation, and shattered every prediction of his downfall. He believes himself untouchable. He is wrong.

Because men who reach too far, men who stand alone, men who decide that they are the system rather than a part of it—these men do not get to die peacefully in their beds. They do not get to fade away. They are removed.

History does not care how many elections he has won. It does not care how loyal his base is. It does not care that the courts have failed to stop him. History cares only about balance. And when balance is threatened, it is restored—not with votes. Not with impeachments. But with force.

The clock is ticking, and Trump is standing on a stage built by ghosts. And if he does not step down, if he does not fall in line, the stage will collapse beneath him.

Because there is one truth, written in blood across time: when a leader becomes too dangerous to the system, the system eliminates the leader.
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,901
Reactions
15,070
Points
113
Copied-:

Written by someone named Mark Pitt...

Trump will not last his full term. Not because of elections. Not because
of scandals. But because he has done the one thing no leader can do and survive: he has made himself bigger than the machine that created him.

The Ukraine meeting wasn’t just a blunder—it was a declaration of war, not against a foreign nation, but against the very order that keeps leaders in power and ensures their safety. He has done what no American president has done before—shaken the world’s foundations in a way that even his allies cannot ignore. NATO isn’t just a military alliance; it is the thread that has held global power together since 1945. And he is snapping it, strand by strand.

The system is patient, but it is not merciful. There are men whose names will never be known, whose influence is never written about, but who determine which presidents rise—and which ones fall. These men do not forgive. They do not warn. They do not lose. And Trump, for all his bravado, for all his victories, is stepping into a space where there is no precedent but one—what happens when a leader becomes too great a threat to the equilibrium.

His inner circle is not a government; it is a fortress of the damned, filled with men and women who stay close out of necessity, out of fear, out of the knowledge that when the end comes, proximity might mean survival. But history is unkind to emperors without an empire. The purges, the firings, the dismantling of the security apparatus—this isn’t a reformer cleaning house. This is a man sawing off the very branch he sits on. And when it breaks, there will be no one left to catch him.

At 79, Trump is no longer playing for policy or power. He is playing for immortality. He has won every battle, defied every expectation, and shattered every prediction of his downfall. He believes himself untouchable. He is wrong.

Because men who reach too far, men who stand alone, men who decide that they are the system rather than a part of it—these men do not get to die peacefully in their beds. They do not get to fade away. They are removed.

History does not care how many elections he has won. It does not care how loyal his base is. It does not care that the courts have failed to stop him. History cares only about balance. And when balance is threatened, it is restored—not with votes. Not with impeachments. But with force.

The clock is ticking, and Trump is standing on a stage built by ghosts. And if he does not step down, if he does not fall in line, the stage will collapse beneath him.


Because there is one truth, written in blood across time: when a leader becomes too dangerous to the system, the system eliminates the leader.
I like the sentiment, but I'm not sure what systems or history force moves fast enough to get this done before 4 years are over.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
mrzz World Affairs 2475
T World Affairs 13
britbox World Affairs 88
britbox World Affairs 1020
britbox World Affairs 46