In the middle of it, I thought Lawrence would understand "nuts" as "nutters" - mad or eccentric people - and he would "avoid any contact" with them and his compulsory nut eating disorder be the result of his developing social anxiety. That would be even better.This conversation reminds me of a comic strip I used to read.
I like you brother
I am easy . I just have certain opinions that I have arrived at after a long time and just like everyone else, they are never perfect. I try though...That is why I am open to being proven wrong A lot of people I know are victims to their ideologies. Ideology stops you from thinking, at least in high resolution. Yes, I am perfectly fine with the change of the term from "unforced error" to "cheap error", although I don't really care as much as you do. So we could have a "forced error" and "cheap error" in match comments and stats captions. We change the names sometimes as our language evolves. Those who gave the name in the first place, might have been careless and the name might have been misleading or imprecise. If we find a better name we may want to substitute an old name at some point. In this case of course, you have to convince ATP that your name is better, because there will be plenty of people who disagree with your name. I, as said above, don't care.I like you brother
Got to put the language thing aside though, agree to disagree there.
Sticking to tennis. All I am asking is this: Would not it be more accurate to call it a "cheap" or "easy" error, as opposed to unforced, when it is clear that in the overwhelming majority of the cases you are forced to hit a shot? Just help me out here
Nadal is the perfect example why UFEs do not exist
. In my opinion "cheap" or "easy" or 'lazy" they all work better because they do not ignore the other person on the other side of the net, like the word "unforced" does.
Your opinion is simply wrong, and unnecessary whinge. Cheap, lazy and easy errors are UFEs by definition.....the tennis world goes by it, not your personal definition that’s fits your criteria. Let’s say Novak was playing someone much inferior, he knows he can win no matter what, is under no pressure at all, carelessly serves a double fault (return would be shit anyway) but it’s not ok to call it UFE in your opinion. Guess what, this whole post is a whinge out of nothing. UFE and FE are all part of the game, always have been and always will be. Nobody except some here would be stupid enough to expand in the stats category for ‘easy errors’, ‘lazy errors’ or whatever bollock...you can take that for granted.Nadal is the perfect example why UFEs do not exist
Question: You hit a great shot and a really weak reply comes back close to the net...a sitter waiting to be punished. The guy who sent the weak reply runs to the side that he thinks the ball will be sent to. He guesses right but the ball is hit wide and he wins the point. Is this a forced or unforced error?
