Front242 said:
calitennis127 said:
Kieran said:
Now before it grows legs and runs ahead of me: it was me who mentioned Sampras and I confined it to certain aspects of his match today. I didn't mean that Kyrgios is comparable to Pete, or that he's the next Pete, or any bandwagon stuff. The caveats are in place.
But for his performance today under pressure, his ability to hurl serves when he needed them, his slouch and his composure, he was reminiscent of one of the incomparable ones.
But....etc...
I agree that Kyrgios's mentality sets him apart from most of the players in his generation. He is much tougher and brings some American football/basketball swagger to the plate.
He wouldn't have won the match against Nadal without it.
He is also a great athlete and seems to have pretty good stamina.
Have a read of some of the bitter Nadal fans coments here. Some utter nonsense posts slagging Kyrgios completely unfairly for nothing. Unreal.
http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2014/07/teen-who-beat-nadal-at-wimbledon-out-next-week/52003/#.U7mr4bE9C2X
Great delusional rafa fan noise here:
"This guy is another Rosol..thats it ...Had rafa played a better 3rd set, He would have gone home then only and Rafa would have beaten Raonic and Fed with his auto pilot mode ..Unfortunately Rafa played a bad 3rd set when he was 5-4 and had two chances to close on 6-4 and again in tie breaker , he lost a simple rally with Kyrgios ...Otherwise Rafa would have made to finals and probably beaten Novak ...It was just a lottery for Kyrgios that rafa played a bad tennis on that day..."
Jumping the gun a bit. They forgot to put that after rafa would have beaten novak (had he not played crap tennis in the round of 16), he would have ascended to heaven gold trophy in hand, never to be seen again, until entering the 2060 wimbledon under an assumed name as a wild card winning again as the resurreectd rafa.