Jelenafan
Multiple Major Winner
Hey El Dude, then is this whole board of the female gender?^ The lady doth protest too much.
Hey El Dude, then is this whole board of the female gender?^ The lady doth protest too much.
Well, to be fair to the rest of the Nadal fans, it is only Nadalfan2013 that endlessly goes on about Novak and Rafa having a +1 Slam edge. At least the rest show some moderation.Hey El Dude, then is this whole board of the female gender?
Well, to be fair to the rest of the Nadal fans, it is only Nadalfan2013 that endlessly goes on about Novak and Rafa having a +1 Slam edge. At least the rest show some moderation.
Well, to be fair to the rest of the Nadal fans, it is only Nadalfan2013 that endlessly goes on about Novak and Rafa having a +1 Slam edge. At least the rest show some moderation.
I prefer to go w/ hardcore facts & #'s rather than muse about what should have happened if not for an age disparity, a weak era, & physical encumbrement! I've been blogging about this BS for years! This site is mild in its fanaticism considering how delusional some fans can be fawning over Nadal! They don't even see the embarrassment of it all where Novak owns & has smashed the record-books save the "major's race!" It's only a matter of time! My all time faves continue to be Borg, Lendl, Sampras, Federer early on, now Djokovic!
A bit of a contradiction in your statement? Saying you go with hardcore facts and yet making a speculative " It's only a matter of time." It may happen but until it does, then perhaps Djokovic's records are not worthy either because of , as you say, "age disparity, a weak era and physical encumbrement" (whatever the hell that means)
Just as annoying to you as fans of a certain player are, it's just as annoying to see nonfans with a transparent agenda disparage/belittle what a player HAS accomplished, those so called "hard core" facts. Why shouldn't Rafafan2013 enjoy Rafa's Major total? It's a huge accomplishment.
I don't mind opinions, but it's amusing when opinions are couched as if the poster only deals with facts.
Nadal is gone. Djoker’s looking pretty good.It doesn't matter because Nadal has the slam record and Djokovic is clearly finished.
Djokovic is looking good at faking his injury I agree 100%Nadal is gone. Djoker’s looking pretty good.
Maybe, but he’s also hitting the ball as well as I’ve ever seen him in his 20 years on tour.Djokovic is looking good at faking his injury I agree 100%
If true, and I know you watch him carefully, it does imply that the hamstring injury was a red herring. Or a miraculous recovery brought on by the thought-process.Maybe, but he’s also hitting the ball as well as I’ve ever seen him in his 20 years on tour.
Similar to Nadal‘s foot yet still winning the slam; could be real, could be imagined. I watched him pull up in Adelaide. I would say, as with everything, he is overly cautious with any niggling injury and babies it more than he has to.If true, and I know you watch him carefully, it does imply that the hamstring injury was a red herring. Or a miraculous recovery brought on by the thought-process.
Except that Rafa didn't reveal the foot problem until after the tournament, IIRC. Novak likes to play a bit of preemptive possum. Surely they're cautious about their bodies and niggles, at this age. But Novak does kind of tend to sing it out, until it comes to nothing. It's a pattern.Similar to Nadal foot yet still winning the slam, could be real, could be imagined. I watched him pull up in Adelaide. I would say, as with everything, he is overly cautious with any niggling injury and babies it more than he has to.
As with all things it can be seen more than one way, and depending on one’s predilections the way we see something can be firmly entrenched. That doesn’t make it true though.Except that Rafa didn't reveal the foot problem until after the tournament, IIRC. Novak likes to play a bit of preemptive possum. Surely they're cautious about their bodies and niggles, at this age. But Novak does kind of tend to sing it out, until it comes to nothing. It's a pattern.
Still, it's a false equivalence...one saying he had problems after the fact, and one letting potential problems out, then them coming to nought. Of the two, you surely have to recognize who is the more injury-plagued. Djokovic complains a lot, but doesn't seem to lose much time to injury.As with all things it can be seen more than one way, and depending on one’s predilections the way we see something can be firmly entrenched. That doesn’t make it true though.
Still, it's a false equivalence...one saying he had problems after the fact, and one letting potential problems out, then them coming to nought. Of the two, you surely have to recognize who is the more injury-plagued. Djokovic complains a lot, but doesn't seem to lose much time to injury.
He’s also had his share of surgeries and recovery. What is odd is that you seem to think that part of Novak’s winning strategy is to cook up a fake injury to throw opponents off their game. Since you see little need to hide your disdain for him, I can see how you could believe that. I don’t know if that’s part of his winning strategy or not. I do know that he’s hyper-vigilant about his health and physical wellbeing… sometimes when he doesn’t need to be.Of the two, you surely have to recognize who is the more injury-plagued. Djokovic complains a lot, but doesn't seem to lose much time to injury.
At 35, I'd say he's not had his "share." He's been pretty lucky/blessed in the health dept. A "procedure" a couple of years back. What else?He’s also had his share of surgeries and recovery.
Not so odd. As you can see, I'm not the only one.What is odd is that you seem to think that part of Novak’s winning strategy is to cook up a fake injury to throw opponents off their game.
Why should I, as to bolded above? But, as I said, I'm not alone in my opinion about the feeling he's "cooking up fake injuries."Since you see little need to hide your disdain for him, I can see how you could believe that.
This is the 2nd time you've kind of copped to the fact that he's kind of faking it, too. So don't call me out for making a point of it.I don’t know if that’s part of his winning strategy or not.
It's one thing to be "hyper-vigilant," it's another to pronounce it in public before time, only for it to mean nothing. What would amaze me is if any players still fall for it.I do know that he’s hyper-vigilant about his health and physical wellbeing… sometimes when he doesn’t need to be.
Yes, a lesson to us all about stretching.I think he has taken better care of himself than a lot of other players out there, especially with his preventative measures regarding diet and stretching… and stretching. As a result he has lost less play time due to injury.
If you mean 2019, and after the USO, he did win Tokyo and Paris after that, so it's not like he was done for the season.His shoulder surgery a few years ago took him out of the last quarter of the season.
No, I'm just asking the questions, like a lot of other people. What "fact" did I insist upon?Regarding using ”fake” injuries, I do not think it is a strategy he uses, but you believe it is a fact.
Sure, things can be seen different ways, especially when they are a bit mysterious. Djokovic prompts questions about his fitness, because he complains of injury, then shows no signs of it. I didn't invent this myself. Many inquiring minds want to know. Surely we can absolutely remain cordial as we discuss it, so don't accuse me of confusing opinion with facts. I've only expressed my own opinion, as regards to this current hamstring injury, at the very least.This is why I stated earlier; as with all things it can be seen more than one way, and depending on one’s predilections the way we see something can be firmly entrenched. The nice thing about a civil society, is that we have the ability to have differing opinions yet remain cordial.