MargaretMcAleer
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2013
- Messages
- 46,705
- Reactions
- 30,786
- Points
- 113
Just returned from the gym and had the time to read the report from CAS on Halep's case
The Cas panel found that Halep did bear some level of fault or negligence for her violations, as she did not exercise sufficient care when using the Keto MCT supplement, it concluded that she bore not significant fault or negligence.
The CAS panel seemed to contradict themselves, they also said, ' it was not comfortably satisfied' Halep had committed an offence and the panel dismissed the charge?
Am I missing something here? or is CAS missing something?
The Cas panel found that Halep did bear some level of fault or negligence for her violations, as she did not exercise sufficient care when using the Keto MCT supplement, it concluded that she bore not significant fault or negligence.
The CAS panel seemed to contradict themselves, they also said, ' it was not comfortably satisfied' Halep had committed an offence and the panel dismissed the charge?
Am I missing something here? or is CAS missing something?
Last edited: