Moxie629 said:Wawrinka v. Mahut final. I hope Mahut can pull it off...he deserves a win.
Moxie629 said:Wawrinka v. Mahut final. I hope Mahut can pull it off...he deserves a win.
Front242 said:Well, the winner is the only one who deserves to win but Mahut's kinda disappeared of late. In fact haven't seen him in any tournaments since the last time he played at Wimbledon and Queens last year. Ranking just too low or was he inured and not playing for a while? Anyway, hope he wins.
herios said:Front242 said:Well, the winner is the only one who deserves to win but Mahut's kinda disappeared of late. In fact haven't seen him in any tournaments since the last time he played at Wimbledon and Queens last year. Ranking just too low or was he inured and not playing for a while? Anyway, hope he wins.
He was injured last year in October and returned to play challlengers by end of february.
His ranking has plumetted and now he is at 240. Would be his first ever title, at 31y of age (new peak for tennis players)
Moxie629 said:herios said:Front242 said:Well, the winner is the only one who deserves to win but Mahut's kinda disappeared of late. In fact haven't seen him in any tournaments since the last time he played at Wimbledon and Queens last year. Ranking just too low or was he inured and not playing for a while? Anyway, hope he wins.
He was injured last year in October and returned to play challlengers by end of february.
His ranking has plumetted and now he is at 240. Would be his first ever title, at 31y of age (new peak for tennis players)
(Good one, herios, about "new peak age!" ) I would add, sentimentally, that Mahut/Llodra lost the finals at RG this year in doubles v. Bryans, and Mahut was inconsolable. Also, he deserves to be more than a mere foot-note for that Isner match at Wimbledon, which wrecked both of them for quite a long time, but really put Mahut in a bad place, as he was already the lower-ranked.
I agree that the won who wins the tournament "deserves" it, strictly speaking. I'm just saying that Mahut is due, "karmically," if you will, and I hope he wins.
herios said:Can anyone find another example in the past to have such a low ranked player (240 in this case) to have won an ATP event?
johnsteinbeck said:very glad for Nicolas. really feel like this is quite deserved. he had to go throug Qualis here, right? still, had his WC for Wimby - which makes sense. got a feeling they'll rarely say no when he asks for one
bummer for Stan - as i'd said, he would've been the year's swiss #1 if he'd taken the title. hope he can come back strong v ol' Rusty.
kskate2 said:Congrats to the 2013 s'Hertogenbosh champ, Nicholas Mahut on his first ATP title. Well done at age 31. :clap
it's easy - you just check the points right a couple of hours before the Halle points were added and make wrong assumptionsDenisovich said:johnsteinbeck said:very glad for Nicolas. really feel like this is quite deserved. he had to go throug Qualis here, right? still, had his WC for Wimby - which makes sense. got a feeling they'll rarely say no when he asks for one
bummer for Stan - as i'd said, he would've been the year's swiss #1 if he'd taken the title. hope he can come back strong v ol' Rusty.
how would that have been possible? he trails Federer by 400 points in the race to London.