Broken_Shoelace said:
federberg said:
Haven't really been following this thread, but I must admit I forgot about Richard Williams. That's a debate ender right there. Has to be him surely. Particularly when you consider the resistance they would have had to face. From Compton to Centre Court... 2 siblings? One you might call a fluke or freakish.. but two? No question.. it has to be Richard Williams
Kieran pointed it out half-jokingly but he's right, Richard Williams was a coach on the WTA tour. That kind of rules him out of this particular discussion.
I don't see why it would, as we're talking about tennis coaches, and he is one. Unless you mean this is an ATP conversation, but we don't always adhere to that, strictly. And I'm not saying that as a woman or a feminist, just that it's a fair point about R. Wms.
DarthFed said:
Greatest coach is always going to be a subjective matter especially when we are talking coaches of one player, even if that player is one of the best ever. When you have someone coach multiple players who show noticeable improvement when they come and/or noticeably fall off when the coach is gone then you can say such and such is a great coach. As an example Lendl is looking better and better with Murray badly struggling this year, but even still you might hold off calling him a great coach until if/when he takes on another coaching job.
I get the point that Toni raising a great player from scratch, (and Richard Williams two of them,) is one kind of interesting accomplishment, but, on the other hand, being a small sample-size. Lendl, at his point, might just be called the right person at the right time for an already elite player, so I think we have to reserve judgement on him.