MargaretMcAleer
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2013
- Messages
- 46,521
- Reactions
- 30,611
- Points
- 113
I have ESP, lol!.....just going on their ranking that is all, just an observation, not set in stone yetWell, that implies draw fixing. Or you have ESP.
I have ESP, lol!.....just going on their ranking that is all, just an observation, not set in stone yetWell, that implies draw fixing. Or you have ESP.
I tend to agree with you, however I’m not completely sure about guys like Alcaraz and Rune being physically reliable to go all the way — even though the Spaniard did it in New York. Novak hasn’t been on fire this clay season, of course, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t capable of showing up in Paris and winning, perhaps easily. He has the mental and physical stamina to do it, whereas the others aren’t such sure bets. He doesn’t have The Aura about him he used to have, but he‘s still the guy who knows more than anyone else who will be there how to win a major.RG is wide-open, but that also means that I don't have a huge amount of confidence in Novak. He just doesn't seem himself, and it is a quality that speaks of age-related decline. I think he's more than capable of winning another Slam, maybe two, but RG would be the hardest for him, at this point (imo). In a way he reminds me of latter-day Roger or Rafa off clay, where he's still a/the guy to beat, but it doesn't seem a foregone conclusion.
But this also makes this tournament interesting. I see Alcaraz as the favorite, but there's not a huge gap between him and a few other players, and there's also more of a chance of a surprise winner.
I would put Everyone Else above Tsitsipas and Ruud.My personal rankings in terms of likelihood of winning RG would be:
- Alcaraz
- Djokovic
- Medvedev
- Rune
- Tsitsipas
- Ruud
- Everyone else
I hesitated on Rublev - possibly putting him above Ruud - but ended up including him in "everything else," mainly because he's never made it past a Slam QF. I have a feeling he'll do well, but hard to see him going all the way. Would love to see it, though.I'm trolling this thread for hints on my draw challenge, when the draw comes out.
Draw Challenge
Pit your wits against fellow members on predicting tennis draws.www.tennisfrontier.com
Do play!
So, I see some lists of favorites. Margaret has got her mojo working on Novak being drawn to Charlie's half. (She won't say she wants that to happen, but I will! And hey, if @kskate has a good crystal ball for predictions, why not Margaret? No match-fixing!)
Curious to know if anyone sees a potential dark horse, and especially who you see as the potential spoilers/dangerous floaters. I think Margaret listed the winners of clay tune-ups, which is a good place to start.
Rublev won MC, def. Rune, and Rublev seems not to be in the conversation. Lajovic won Banja Luka, so he must be a dark horse, or surely a spoiler to look out for. Frances Tiafoe won Houston on clay, so he should be dangerous, early rounds. Roberto Carballes Baena won Marrakech.
Honestly, I'm not camp Rublev. Nothing against him, but he's a spoiler, at best.I hesitated on Rublev - possibly putting him above Ruud - but ended up including him in "everything else," mainly because he's never made it past a Slam QF. I have a feeling he'll do well, but hard to see him going all the way. Would love to see it, though.
I still think FAA is going to surprise us one of these days, but don't think it will be at RG.
Hammy is old news, elbow is a new thing
Novak barely won a few matches on clay this year and showed very little of good play, so it is something to worry about. I don't know what to expect from him, something tells that he won't bag this FO. Players are not bending over to him anymore (except the greek), young guys like Rune and Alcaraz are certainly not afraid and they smell the blood, they see he is beatable. Now they "only" need to prove it on a slam.
My guess is that Novak beats Rune in RG if they meet, but Alcaraz and Medvedev are going to be a difficult task. Both can stay with Novak for 4-5 hours if needed.
I'm quoting both of these posts, because they are interesting, and because Don Fabio is hoping for a Novak win, and El Dude is agnostic, I think.RG is wide-open, but that also means that I don't have a huge amount of confidence in Novak. He just doesn't seem himself, and it is a quality that speaks of age-related decline. I think he's more than capable of winning another Slam, maybe two, but RG would be the hardest for him, at this point (imo). In a way he reminds me of latter-day Roger or Rafa off clay, where he's still a/the guy to beat, but it doesn't seem a foregone conclusion.
But this also makes this tournament interesting. I see Alcaraz as the favorite, but there's not a huge gap between him and a few other players, and there's also more of a chance of a surprise winner.
I share you sentiment yet I stop short of such messages insulting fans who like him. It's understandable that someone may like Joker (far more than say liking the Idiot-in-Chief, so called 45th POTUS') still, I hope in absence of Nadal, someone stops Joker in this tournament.
Pretty much. All things being equal (that is, Roger not in the mix), I tend to root for new Slam winners, whoever they may be. I do feel an inkling of growing Holger allegiance, though, if only because I enjoy watching him play and his spirit. He's a lot of fun (and really talented). But his time will come, and I'd kind of like someone like Rublev or even Tsitsipas to win a Slam. But I'd be very surprised if it didn't go to Novak, Alcaraz, or Medvedev, with Rune being the darkhorse.El Dude is agnostic
This is all well said - I think you're right. It might be that Rafa being gone will make him more prone to an upset, as every Slam is an opportunity to probably take the Slam lead for good. In a way, though, RG is his best opportunity, as more players are dangerous potential spoilers at Wimbledon, and US Open always seems dicey.As to El Dude's point, I do think age-related is an issue. It's not just fitness, but the stress of the window closing, as when he couldn't seal the deal on the USO for the CYGS. Or when Roger couldn't close on Wimbledon, in 2019. Or when Rafa was full of nerves facing Medvedev, in the 2019 USO.
I still see Novak as the favorite, but not by a lot. And I think he's vulnerable early. It will be interesting to see what his draw is like.
ElDude it seems that since the first time you've been touting Felix's horn....I hesitated on Rublev - possibly putting him above Ruud - but ended up including him in "everything else," mainly because he's never made it past a Slam QF. I have a feeling he'll do well, but hard to see him going all the way. Would love to see it, though.
I still think FAA is going to surprise us one of these days, but don't think it will be at RG.