Moxie
Multiple Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 43,841
- Reactions
- 14,998
- Points
- 113
Front242 said:Broken_Shoelace said:Front242 said:That might have some merit when you're talking 30+ shots rallies but not a routine 3-5 shot one. Those are indeed inexplicable and you know it.
Actually, please don't tell me that "I know it" when what you're saying is an absolute fallacy. No, I don't know it.
Players, especially earlier in Nadal's career when he would cover every inch of the court, knew how quick he was and how well he defended, so they overhit, whether it was a 3-5 shot rally or longer. I mean, it's such an obvious point I'm surprised you don't get it.
Say I hit a serve out wide, Nadal gets it to it, I know how quick he is, so even when I'm going to play V tennis (ie hit to the open side of the court) I feel like I have to hit it closer to the line because I know he can get to it and pass me given how quick he is. The hell does that have anything to do with 30 point rallies? He made them go for more because he would get so many balls back in play, so they started going for more in general, not just during longer rallies.
Now wonder you're at a loss to explain all those Fedal matches.
I can come up with plenty of explanations to the Fedal matches but I won't bother. Nadal hasn't been lightning fast for quite a while now so that's no longer the reason Fed is walloping easy forehands into the net. He actually does it against everyone these days.
Yeah, don't bother. Maybe you'll go for it on the Fedal thread. Honestly, Front, you're proving my point about fanatics: you're refusing to see that Nadal's game has applied pressure on opponents and caused them to go for too much, thus producing what seem like uncharacteristic errors. And, as Broken illustrated, there is no reason to say that applies only to long rallies. We're not talking about the recent past with regards to Federer, but 23 losses cannot be explained away by "bad days," or mono, or whatever other defense you had in mind. Nadal's game had a negative effect on Federer's, and Roger never made a good adjustment to counter it.