mrzz
Hater
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 6,321
- Reactions
- 3,229
- Points
- 113
About Zverev and Thiem... Zverev is my second choice for future elite. Yes, he won two MS which is something, but... in Rome, it was actually Thiem who did the heavy lifting... I simply doubt Zverev could handle Nadal there -- I doubt he would make it even competitive on a clay court. There is the injury factor in Montreal, but, a win is win anyway, good for him (as I said earlier, I like the guy). Thiem has only ATP 500 wins, but his major semis should count for something in the comparison.
What I see on Thiem and can't see in anybody else is the ability to play consistently on an absolute high level (I mean big 3 level) -- even if only on clay just yet. This is not "potential", this is the real deal, he did that already in 2017. I am sure you guys agree that this is not for everyone, and I believe it is far easier to fix or tweak one or another thing here and there surface related than to develop this capacity.
What I see on Thiem and can't see in anybody else is the ability to play consistently on an absolute high level (I mean big 3 level) -- even if only on clay just yet. This is not "potential", this is the real deal, he did that already in 2017. I am sure you guys agree that this is not for everyone, and I believe it is far easier to fix or tweak one or another thing here and there surface related than to develop this capacity.