On why players are seemingly winning more after 30

[britbox]

I'm not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me. When I made the point originally in the other thread. I said it made no sense to look at the Big 3 (I agree with you, they're freaks, and I actually think their best results were all in their mid to late 20s). My point is that if you look lower down the ranks, there are so many older players getting the best results of their career in their later years

Agreeing on the Big Three... on the other stuff, I think technololgy gives with one hand but takes away with another.

 

[El Dude]

Agreeing on the Big Three... on the other stuff, I think technololgy gives with one hand but takes away with another.

You’ve been watching too much Black Mirror.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Andy22]

Well the only guy who wins slams well into his 30s is only Federer, and the only other guy over 30 winning slams is just Rafa. The road for 30s + isn’t as wide as it appears.

Well yea but I find it weird that more players have not won slams in they 30s that's still young even in tennis

 

[Andy22]

Well I think Nadal being the only one to ended a season 1.NO at 30 years of age is Awesome. And just adds to Nadals goat career

 

[Federberg]

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/players-li...rolong-their-careers-says-chris-evert-1658732