Novak needs to end this farce once and for all

[Denis]

Do they go to troll school? Or maybe there's a handbook. Seriously, they use the same words, no matter which team they play for. Also, the trope of starting a thread about every little thought that wanders lonely through their empty heads like the Ancient Mariner. Aggressively stupid is also a commonality.

As soon as they graduate they should receive a ban here, no need to waste time on these idiots.

 

[Horsa]

Do they go to troll school? Or maybe there's a handbook. Seriously, they use the same words, no matter which team they play for. Also, the trope of starting a thread about every little thought that wanders lonely through their empty heads like the Ancient Mariner. Aggressively stupid is also a commonality.

I don't know. I think they should go back to school & learn their 3 R's. I'm not trying to be rude & realise that English may not be their Mother-tongue but working out what they are trying to say can be a problem. Mind you, I'm used to seeing things properly written like in books. I can't really say anything. I started a couple of junk threads that I didn't realise were junk at 1st but that's because I'm normally spontaneous & while it serves me well most of the time & can be a blessing it causes me to put my big size 8's into things sometimes.

 

[Moxie]

As soon as they graduate they should receive a ban here, no need to waste time on these idiots.

I thought there was a soft policy on bans.

 

[isabelle]

King Roger = monfed. O am I being too obvious?

agree with you, Monfed was banned so he came back as KingRoger

 

[britbox]

agree with you, Monfed was banned so he came back as KingRoger

Monfed wasn't banned so he'd have no need to come back as King Roger.

 

[Horsa]

Monfed wasn't banned so he'd have no need to come back as King Roger.

Credit where it's due. King Roger isn't as insulting as Monfed (in fact he hasn't insulted anyone *yet*) which is a good thing. I hope I haven't spoken too soon though.

 

[Denis]

I thought there was a soft policy on bans.

I wouldn’t mind an exception for obvious trolls.

 

[isabelle]

Monfed wasn't banned so he'd have no need to come back as King Roger.

a double account ???

 

[Front242]

What makes you all so convinced it's the same guy as Monfed (very much doubt it is) and hope people realize there are plenty of other clowns on here too creating stupid threads?

 

[Horsa]

What makes you all so convinced it's the same guy as Monfed (very much doubt it is) and hope people realize there are plenty of other clowns on here too creating stupid threads?

He has a similar writing style but seems nicer so far. I realise that. I've done it myself at times when I've thought it was a good idea at the time but realised later it wasn't. In my case it's because I'm very spontaneous & while spontaneity works very well for me most of the time it doesn't always & I sometimes put my big size 8's into things.

 

[Front242]

^ Well this King Roger isn't half as annoying as some of the Nadal clowns and, speaking of spontaneity, it'd be nice if they'd spontaneously combust.

 

[Horsa]

^ Well this King Roger isn't half as annoying as some of the Nadal clowns and, speaking of spontaneity, it'd be nice if they'd spontaneously combust.

I agree that King Roger isn't 1/2 as annoying as some of the Nadal clowns but at least the Nadal clowns aren't as insulting as Monfed. (To tell you the truth I felt sorry for all the trolls at 1st including Monfed because of their lack of writing ability.) Talking about spontaneity, I disagree with spontaneous combustion but kinda like the idea of spontaneous generation & wish that they'd spontaneously generate into well-read, well-versed, well-spoken, nice & interesting people.

 

[Nadalfan2013]

Federer fans not only do so much trolling, they are actually the ones who invented it

They need to grow up cause sometimes they are rude and attack others personally.

Nadal fans including myself don't troll, we are actually funny.

 

[britbox]

Well, one holds out hope that trolls evolve and adopt the conversationalist ethos of a forum... as opposed to the sort of garbage you find on Youtube comment threads.

 

[DarthFed]

I thought there was a soft policy on bans.

Yes there is. @kskate2 and @britbox have kept me around despite all the nice things I say on occasion.

 

[britbox]

Yes there is. @kskate2 and @britbox have kept me around despite all the nice things I say on occasion.

With all that smack talk in the chess thread, you're lucky to be around

 

[Federberg]

It won't be the greatest win of Nadal's career. Not even close.
It's like saying AO 2017 was the greatest win of Federer's career. And even there Fed had a much worse h2h record against Nadal especially in slams. He turned that around, not the h2h but that match.
Nadal, all in all, has a winning h2h vs Djokovic in slams. And he's also close in the overall h2h. So yeah, Nadal beating Novak is not really the same thing as Fed beating Nadal.

After the way he capitulated at Wimbledon against him last year. When Novak was as lacking in confidence as he was, it would be some mental turnaround. I never used the superlative by the way. Let's stipulate that Rafa, Roger and Novak can beat each other, but it's the mental aspect of the game I'm focussed on. If Novak continues to play with the confidence and swagger that he's had since late last year it's hard to see how Rafa beats him without some huge mental leap. That is why I would class it as one of his great wins

 

[Horsa]

Well, one holds out hope that trolls evolve and adopt the conversationalist ethos of a forum... as opposed to the sort of garbage you find on Youtube comment threads.

That would be nice. We all live & learn (well hopefully) & people can & do change. I can't say anything though as I tend to go in writer mode every so often in a conversation although I know I've got areas on here to do my writing which I have to thank you for. I also have to be thankful to people for being patient with me when I do get wordy or start thinking in rhyme.

 

[Horsa]

Yes there is. @kskate2 and @britbox have kept me around despite all the nice things I say on occasion.

That's great. You're a nice guy most of the time though sometimes you remind me of the guy in panto who everyone boos & hisses & I find you funny in that mode as I think you're acting. It wouldn't be the same here without you. You also make newbies feel welcome. You befriended Monfed & were a good influence on him to start with then he seemed to have a bad influence on you. It was nice to see you have a little friend though. As much as I disagree with him I'm very sorry your friend isn't here for you to talk to. (That's something good that can be said for Monfed. I can't think of anything else good about Monfed though other than he'd be funny if he wasn't so insulting.)

I'm very sorry if you don't like what I've just said. I said exactly what I thought.

 

[King Roger]

Guys I have never even heard of “monfed” so I have no clue who that is, let’s just say I’ve had numerous bans on talk tennis forums for bashing Nadal and speaking the truth, but you get a ban for creating a post on that forum it’s lunacy!