NBA (whenever)...

[kskate2]

Just heard on ESPN, NY is booting Thibs

 

[Federberg]

1. Halli was the better player throughout the series. Siakem showed up like 2 games and made a dent. I know people don't want to think about it, but it's possible the establishment didn't take too kindly to Halli's choking gesture in game 1. I know why he did it, but felt it was completely inappropriate. Man, just ball. That's what you get paid for. He's too good. Doesn't need any extra-curricular histrionics.

2. Yes, KAT missed some defensive assignments, FTs and had a few turnovers. But NY need not point the finger to anyone but the mirror. That was a collective effort of slop. It was always an uphill battle to beat Indy, but after they imploded in game 1, it was extremely difficult seeing them winning the series anyway. Poor Brunson was on fumes. Dude been carrying the whole team on his back all season. Why do you think Thibs gave him those extended rest periods? He was so exhausted I saw him turn the ball over late in games, allow himself to get trapped in a double team and then throw up a prayer that had no chance of going in.

and now Thibs paid for it. Management makes personnel changes that don't suit the coach, and when it goes wrong, the coach pays for it. Even though the Knicks actually exceeded expectations. Reminds me of the Mark Brown sacking.

Re: Halli.. I assume that gesture was in homage to Reggie Miller?

 

[kskate2]

and now Thibs paid for it. Management makes personnel changes that don't suit the coach, and when it goes wrong, the coach pays for it. Even though the Knicks actually exceeded expectations. Reminds me of the Mark Brown sacking.

Re: Halli.. I assume that gesture was in homage to Reggie Miller?

correct on both accounts

 

[Federberg]

Yes I will stick to it. I think OKC will be able to handle them but confidence is a big thing and Indy would be brimming with it if they make it and I think they still will. I’m interested to see if either of these do go back 2-2. OKC getting absolutely smashed in game 3 was a surprise. Of course it is just 1 game but that probably gives Ant and co a lot more confidence than a narrow win would have after the first two beatdowns.

I do think Indy will drop the hammer in game 4 similar to the Cavs series, and then could finish it in 5 or will take care of business in game 6.

Told ya. Pacers are not like anything they’ve faced. Not saying they win the series BUT..

 

[Federberg]

Halliburton is an absolute killer

 

[DarthFed]

Told ya. Pacers are not like anything they’ve faced. Not saying they win the series BUT..

Yeah it’s insane. When you come back this many times against all odds there clearly is just an incredible amount of confidence that they are bringing. That said, looking at the stats OKC shot < 40%, got massacred on the boards and Indy went 18-39 on 3’s and they still led until literally the last second. Indy did have 18 more turnovers than OKC though so that is unlikely to repeat as well.

I say winner of game 2 wins the series, but even if it comes back to OKC at 2-2 that is scary for them given what the Pacers have shown they can do. They are now 7-2 on the road in these playoffs

 

[kskate2]

If these teams weren't bent on jacking up a plethora of 3's, they wouldn't lose the lead w/ 2 minutes left. If you can't hold a double digit lead w/ 2 mins left, you deserve whatever happens. Put some points on the board (be it a runner, jump shot or a FT) and stop relying on the long ball because a miss is a like turnover and becomes a fast break on the other end.