Federberg
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2013
- Messages
- 15,573
- Reactions
- 5,662
- Points
- 113
I think that whatever the veracity of Osaka's issues are, and I tend to believe she was being sincere, this crisis is timely. I think the stance of the Slams was clumsy and reactionary. Media has evolved over the years, players like Osaka have a reach which rivals that of conventional media. I think the Slams have to update how they define media. The time has come to look at the utility of the conventional post match interview. I wouldn't be mad if players used their social media platforms as an alternative to communicate their thoughts after matches. I don't see that there is any necessity in subjecting players to some of the crass questions we get from journalists in the post-match room. Quite often what we get from players from their platforms is more insightful or entertaining than what we get from the media scrum. That's not to say that the post-media interview needs to be scrapped, but it beggars my mind that the Slams don't understand that the social media platforms these players have are often more impactful than the standard post match interview. Join us in the 21st century please, it's fun here... If Slams took the stance that some sort of balance between social media and conventional media is sufficient I bet that sponsors would be fine with that. It just takes some sort of collaboration to ensure that the Slams sponsors are somehow acknowledged where the players are using their own platforms. It's not rocket science imho