Nadull wil lose.

[Fastgrass]

Djoko will crush him , another start of losing streak for dull.

Deal with it.

 

[britbox]

RE: Nadull wil lost.

Thanks for the Analysis. Sports Illustrated eat your heart out.

 

[Fastgrass]

RE: Nadull wil lost.

Nole is playing best tennis of his life
2013 WTF CHAMP. NOVAK .

( what is time of match ? Not on ATP site also .)

 

[britbox]

RE: Nadull wil lost.

20.00 UK time

 

[Riotbeard]

RE: Nadull wil lost.

Thanks for the Analysis. Sports Illustrated eat your heart out.

I guess his copy editor was out of town. Them are some pretty bad spelling mistakes.:lolz:

 

[Moxie]

RE: Nadull wil lost.

Thanks for the Analysis. Sports Illustrated eat your heart out.

I guess his copy editor was out of town. Them are some pretty bad spelling mistakes.:lolz:

His copy editor is dead. Died of embarrassment.

 

[Murat Baslamisli]

I will still watch the match though, just in case, if you don't mind...

 

[the AntiPusher]

'
Djoko will crush him , another start of losing streak for dull.

Deal with it.

Wait til HU or BS get a gander at you today. they eat "trolls" for Breakfast. If you don't mind I will watch the match until I am convince that you are a worthy soothsayer or Nostradamus reincarnated, otherwise you are just still probably full of yesterday's lunch. I would suggest prune or grape juice, it works wonders for the Seniors

 

[nehmeth]

Thanks for the Analysis. Sports Illustrated eat your heart out.

I guess his copy editor was out of town. Them are some pretty bad spelling mistakes.:lolz:

His copy editor is dead. Died of embarrassment.

:snigger Your wickedly good sense of humor at its best!

Ralf's game is anything but dull. On hard courts he has learned to plant himself firmly on the baseline and dictate. Only guy he really seems to have trouble with is Novak. I may not be able to see it until later, but I anticipate a very good match. Dull would be Murray v. Djokovic - an advanced version of Pong.

 

[tented]

Djoko will crush him , another start of losing streak for dull.

Deal with it.

Here, this should keep you busy while the adults talk:

[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QC4RvnhYoI[/video]

 

[Murat Baslamisli]

^Crap, Tented, I really enjoyed that video...Should I see a doctor???


:laydownlaughing

 

[tented]

^Crap, Tented, I really enjoyed that video...Should I see a doctor???


:laydownlaughing

As long as you don't want to play doctor with fastgrass you should be OK.

 

[Emma]

I think it's a tough call. Nadal is fresher of the two at this point and the court is reasonably slow, so there will be a lot of rallies. Whoever is more consistent off the ground should prevail. Nole always tends to take time to unfold his game and he comes off a bit nervous at first against Nadal, but he does have Shanghai to look back. One key for Nole is to serve really well so that he can put pressure on Nadal's to hold his own, and given that Nole is the better returner, he should get more than a few chances. It will then definitely come down to clutch moments for both and whoever ends up holding it together on those moments.

I have a meeting so won't be able to follow the scoreboard but perhaps will be follow the 2nd half of the match.

 

[Kieran]

Whatever way you look at it, it's a fresh thing I've seen today, when someone calls Nadal "dull." I think you never watched tennis at all, fastgrass...

 

[Fastgrass]

Blood spinner fans are mad right now , but believe me
SOG playing some of best tennis of his life .
Straight sets victory for SOG ( 75% chances )

 

[Kieran]

Blood spinner fans are mad right now , but believe me
SOG playing dome of best tennis of his life .
Straight sets victory for SOG ( 75% chances )

SOG?

Son of Gobsh1te?

Who are you referring to?

By the way, "will" has two l's...

 

[calitennis127]

Kieran, while I don't find Nadal boring (in general), this poster is far from the first one who I have seen make the "Nadull" joke.

It has a long history to it, based on his playing style. This guy didn't invent it.

And, indeed, the comparative dullness of Nadal's shotmaking to Federer's is why I said that, psychologically and aesthetically, Federer had a clear edge in the match yesterday up to 4-4. Both players knew that it was Federer's for the taking, but he cowered.

 

[Kieran]

Kieran, while I don't find Nadal boring (in general), this poster is far from the first one who I have seen make the "Nadull" joke.

It has a long history to it, based on his playing style. This guy didn't invent it.

And, indeed, the comparative dullness of Nadal's shotmaking to Federer's is why I said that, psychologically and aesthetically, Federer had a clear edge in the match yesterday up to 4-4. Both players knew that it was Federer's for the taking, but he cowered.

Come on, Roger hasn't taken anything of significance off Nadal since Rafa was in short(er) sleeves...

 

[brokenshoelace]

Kieran, while I don't find Nadal boring (in general), this poster is far from the first one who I have seen make the "Nadull" joke.

It has a long history to it, based on his playing style. This guy didn't invent it.

And, indeed, the comparative dullness of Nadal's shotmaking to Federer's is why I said that, psychologically and aesthetically, Federer had a clear edge in the match yesterday up to 4-4. Both players knew that it was Federer's for the taking, but he cowered.

LOL, psychological edge for 8 games, during which Nadal held his serve 3 out of 4 times to love? Keep making up those narratives buddy...

What happened then? Federer blew break points and the psychological edge disappeared? You're literally the first person to ever talk about a psychological edge for Federer over Nadal, for any stretch of any match...

 

[Kieran]

Yeah. He had a psychological edge at 4-4 which he used to lose 3 of the next 4 games...