I don't think Thiem is a classic clay courter. I think he's a solid tennis player with a preference for clay. What about his play do you find "classic clay-courter?" He moves well on clay and he has a patient game, but I didn't peg him for clay, early on. As for Zverer, I'm think he's a better player than Thiem, and he has 3 MS, v. Thiem who has none. That he has 2 on clay I have said I find surprising. I also think they could be a bit circumstantial, but I don't know why any tennis fan should be repelled. If you don't like Zverev, that's on you. He's a very talented tennis player and he has a champion's mentality, imo. How can I think it's bad for tennis if he wins playing well? I do find it puny and adolescent that you can't express your opinion about tennis without resorting to so many derogatory nicknames and digs within each sentence, but that's a style choice, I suppose, and it's yours. It doesn't impress me, particularly, about your opinions, though. It rather diminishes them.