Moxie
Multiple Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 43,697
- Reactions
- 14,873
- Points
- 113
Broken_Shoelace said:Moxie629 said:Front242 said:Given how there's so much talk of the courts slowing down over the years (despite some denying this), how does he actually see it compared to when he was on tour? Since he played in an era when they definitely played faster he can vouch that today's predominantly baseline oriented game is a lot different so it'd be nice to hear his thoughts on court speed changes since then.
Edit: I see Moxie already touched on that so sorry for not seeing that first but it's definitely something I'd like to hear about and probably many others too.
No, I think it's good to reiterate what you think are good questions so BB can prioritize them.
Broken_Shoelace said:Front242 said:Given how there's so much talk of the courts slowing down over the years (despite some denying this)
It's actually those who claim this who are unable to provide any proof. Wimbledon has been slowed down. We know that because it's a fact. Everyone acknowledges it. But how is the AO slowed down, or especially, the US Open?
The Australian Open is a medium paced court. Just compare it to say, Indian Wells and notice the difference.
The courts have been slowed down in two ways: Grass has been slowed down, and indoor carpet has been removed (really unfortunate IMO). Everything else is pretty much intact. What people don't understand is that they watch the US Open in a year like say, 2011, and see the courts playing slow, and immediately yell "courts have been slowed down!" when in fact, the ball change was what really slowed things down that year. What they conveniently ignore is the courts playing lightning fast the previous year, as well as this year. Ironically, the winner was, erm... Nadal.
Go back to the beginning of this US Open, and see everyone commenting on how fasts the courts were playing.
That's why it's an interesting question, IMO, because the question would be firstly IF he thinks they have. It would be good to hear from a player who retired only about 10 years ago.
It absolutely is an interesting question. I was merely responding to the "some continue to deny it" part.
Yes I understood that, Broken. That's why I said it would be interesting to ask a former player firstly IF he thinks they have, and then, if so, the implications for the game, positive and negative.