Thanks britbox
I'm probably way to biased to be able to give an objective opinion about Masha drug case but these are the points I've been pondering about:
1) I'm so sorry for Masha - She had a long and successful career without any scandals on or off court and then such a thing happen This will haunt her no matter if she's allowed to play again on a short term like the OG in Rio or not
2) I question if the drug really was such an performance-enhancing drug else it would have been banned a long time ago and many more athletes would have used this wonderful drug which has been legal since at least 2007
3) I'm sure that if Masha had been aware that the drug would be on the list from Jan 1 she would have stopped using it immediately
4) The only tournament Masha has played after Jan 1 is the AO in which she reached the QF so it's not like she has gained a lot after the drug has been on the list - It would not be fair to punish Masha retroactive and the 4 years max sentence seems way to exaggerated
5) It's peculiar that someone can be completely legal before Jan 1 and suddenly be a drug abuser after that date
Regarding point 3 and 4 in my opinion Masha therefor should only get a warning and be stripped of the points she gained at the AO - In my opinion the punishment should be very limited else it will be taken as a severe offense which it in my humble opinion is not - The lesser punishment the lesser stain on Masha's name - Also since many of Masha's endorsement deals have gotten awry because of this that also should be taken in consideration
I have sympathy for Maria fans, I counted myself as one... obviously to a far lesser degree than yourself. Fans invest in players.
The drug is performance enhancing or players wouldn't take it. Dick Pound (WADA) said it was widespread in tennis based on their 2015 monitoring. Most of these drugs are performance enhancing even from a medicinal angle... or they wouldn't be prescribed.
Now, pre-Jan 2016, I believe nothing should be affected regarding Maria's titles, achievements etc.... The drug was not banned. if it's not banned then it can be used, whether we like the principle or not.
So IMO, everything stands...
I don't agree with (5)... PEDs get banned at some point in time. EPO wasn't on the banned list for a while and then it was.... was it performance enhancing? Definitely. Were people using it classed as cheats when it wasn't banned? No.... but they are cheats when they use it afterwards, because they aren't abiding by the rules of the sport.
In Maria's case, I believe one of her team let her down badly... but the buck stops with her. It is what it is... But I also don't buy all the diabetes stuff.... it wasn't for that, it was for performance enhancement. Not wrong in itself... until it was banned.