oh -- it was ALSO HILLARY that egged her husband on to BOMB SERBIA...based on LIES created by the USA AND NATO AND EU --
about ''milosevic and serbian barbarism".
(serbia and milosevic -- are ACQUITTED of such original ''war crimes" by the VERY SAME HAGUE TRIBUNAL that accused serbia of those war crimes -- as justification to bomb serbia...
but THAT ACQUITTAL -- stated as "no evidence" serbia was the 'war criminal' they SAID it was --
had been BURIED DEEP in a short statement in the FINAL CONCLUSION just 2 months ago -- so NO ONE WILL NOTICE...
long after the DESTRUCTION AND WAR CRIME BY THE USA, NATO , EU against serbia was already done....................
==================================================
Home
Sign up for our FREE Daily Email Newsletter
The announcement last week by the United States of the largest military aid package in its history – to Israel – was a win for both sides.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu could boast that his lobbying had boosted aid from $3.1 billion a year to $3.8bn – a 22 per cent increase – for a decade starting in 2019.
Mr Netanyahu has presented this as a rebuff to those who accuse him of jeopardising Israeli security interests with his government’s repeated affronts to the White House.
In the past weeks alone, defence minister Avigdor Lieberman has compared last year’s nuclear deal between Washington and Iran with the 1938 Munich pact, which bolstered Hitler; and Mr Netanyahu has implied that US opposition to settlement expansion is the same as support for the “ethnic cleansing†of Jews.
American president Barack Obama, meanwhile, hopes to stifle his own critics who insinuate that he is anti-Israel. The deal should serve as a fillip too for Hillary Clinton, the Democratic party’s candidate to succeed Mr Obama in November’s election.
In reality, however, the Obama administration has quietly punished Mr Netanyahu for his misbehaviour. Israeli expectations of a $4.5bn-a-year deal were whittled down after Mr Netanyahu stalled negotiations last year as he sought to recruit Congress to his battle against the Iran deal.
In fact, Israel already receives roughly $3.8bn – if Congress’s assistance on developing missile defence programmes is factored in. Notably, Israel has been forced to promise not to approach Congress for extra funds.
The deal takes into account neither inflation nor the dollar’s depreciation against the shekel.
A bigger blow still is the White House’s demand to phase out a special exemption that allowed Israel to spend nearly 40 per cent of aid locally on weapon and fuel purchases. Israel will soon have to buy all its armaments from the US, ending what amounted to a subsidy to its own arms industry.
Nonetheless, Washington’s renewed military largesse – in the face of almost continual insults – inevitably fuels claims that the Israeli tail is wagging the US dog. Even The New York Times has described the aid package as “too bigâ€.
Since the 1973 war, Israel has received at least $100bn in military aid, with more assistance hidden from view. Back in the 1970s, Washington paid half of Israel’s military budget. Today it still foots a fifth of the bill, despite Israel’s economic success.
But the US expects a return on its massive investment. As the late Israeli politician-general Ariel Sharon once observed, Israel has been a US “aircraft carrier†in the Middle East, acting as the regional bully and carrying out operations that benefit Washington.
Almost no one blames the US for Israeli attacks that wiped out Iraq’s and Syria’s nuclear programmes. A nuclear-armed Iraq or Syria would have deterred later US-backed moves at regime overthrow, as well as countering the strategic advantage Israel derives from its own nuclear arsenal.
In addition, Israel’s US-sponsored military prowess is a triple boon to the US weapons industry, the country’s most powerful lobby. Public funds are siphoned off to let Israel buy goodies from American arms makers. That, in turn, serves as a shop window for other customers and spurs an endless and lucrative game of catch-up in the rest of the Middle East.
The first F-35 fighter jets to arrive in Israel in December – their various components produced in 46 US states – will increase the clamour for the cutting-edge warplane.
Israel is also a “front-line laboratoryâ€, as former Israeli army negotiator Eival Gilady admitted at the weekend, that develops and field-tests new technology Washington can later use itself.
The US is planning to buy back the missile interception system Iron Dome – which neutralises battlefield threats of retaliation – it largely paid for. Israel works closely too with the US in developing cyberwarfare, such as the Stuxnet worm that damaged Iran’s civilian nuclear programme.
But the clearest message from Israel’s new aid package is one delivered to the Palestinians: Washington sees no pressing strategic interest in ending the occupation. It stood up to Mr Netanyahu over the Iran deal but will not risk a damaging clash over Palestinian statehood.
Some believe that Mr Obama signed the aid package to win the credibility necessary to overcome his domestic Israel lobby and pull a rabbit from the hat: an initiative, unveiled shortly before he leaves office, that corners Mr Netanyahu into making peace.
Hopes have been raised by an expected meeting at the United Nations in New York on Wednesday. But their first talks in 10 months are planned only to demonstrate unity to confound critics of the aid deal.
If Mr Obama really wanted to pressure Mr Netanyahu, he would have used the aid agreement as leverage. Now Mr Netanyahu need not fear US financial retaliation, even as he intensifies effective annexation of the West Bank.
Mr Netanyahu has drawn the right lesson from the aid deal – he can act against the Palestinians with continuing US impunity.
- See more at:
http://www.jonathan-cook.net/2016-0...ry-aid-deal-with-israel/#sthash.fL4Eq28N.dpuf
The US Is About To Face The Worst Crisis in Their History
By The Saker
October 24, 2016 "
Information Clearing House" - "
The Saker"- Watching the last Presidential debate was a rather depressing experience. I thought that Trump did pretty well, but that really is not the point here. The point is this: no matter who wins, an acute crisis is inevitable.
Option one: Hillary wins. That’s Obama on steroids, only worse. Remember that Obama himself was Dubya, only worse. Of course, Dubya was just Clinton, only worse. Now the circle is closed. Back to Clinton. Except this time around, we have a women who is deeply insecure, who failed at every single thing that she every tried to do, and who now has a 3 decades long record of disasters and failures. Even when she had no authority to start a war, she started one (told Bill to bomb the Serbs). Now she has that authority. And now she had to stand there, in front of millions of people, and hear Trump tell her “
Putin outsmarted you at every step of the way†(did you see her frozen face when he said that?). Trump is right, Putin did outsmart her and Obama at every step. The problem is that now, after having a President with an inferiority complex towards Putin (Obama) we will have a President with the very same inferiority complex and a morbid determination to impose a no-fly zone over Russian forces in Syria. Looking at Hillary, with her ugly short hair and ridiculous pants, I thought to myself “this is a woman who is trying hard to prove that she is every bit as tough and any man†– except of course that she ain’t. Her record also shows her as being weak, cowardly and with a sense of total impunity. And now, that evil
messianic lunatic with a deep-seated inferiority complex is going to become Commander in Chief?! God help us all!
Option two: Trump wins. Problem: he will be completely alone. The Neocons have a total, repeat total, control of the Congress, the media, banking and finance, and the courts. From Clinton to Clinton they have deeply infiltrated the Pentagon, Foggy Bottom, and the three letter agencies. The Fed is their stronghold. How in the world will Trump deal with these rabid “
crazies in the basement“? Consider the vicious hate campaign which all these “personalities†(from actors, to politicians to reporters) have unleashed against Trump – they have burned their bridges, they know that they will lose it all if Trump wins (and, if he proves to be an easy pushover his election will make no difference anyway). The Neocons have nothing to lose and they will fight to the very last one. What could Trump possibly do to get anything done if he is surrounded by Neocons and their agents of influence? Bring in an entirely different team? How is he going to vet them? His first choice was to take Pence as a VP – a disaster (he is already sabotaging Trump on Syria and the elections outcome). I *dread* the hear whom Trump will appoint as a White House Chief of Staff as I am afraid that just to appease the Neocons he will appoint some new version of the infamous Rahm Emanuel… And should Trump prove that he has both principles and courage, the Neocons can always “Dallas†him and replace him with Pence.
Et voilà !
I see only one way out:
The (imperfect) Putin model
When Putin came to power he inherited a Kremlin every bit as corrupt and traitor-infested as the White House nowadays. As for Russia, she was in pretty much the same sorry shape as the Independent Nazi-run Ukraine. Russia was also run by bankers and AngloZionist puppets and most Russians led miserable lives. The big difference is that, unlike what is happening with Trump, the Russian version of the US Neocons never saw the danger coming from Putin. He was selected by the ruling elites as the representative of the security services to serve along a representative of the big corporate money, Medvedev. This was a compromise solution between the only two parts of the Russian society which were still functioning, the security services and oil/gas money. Putin looked like a petty bureaucrat in an ill fitting suit, a shy and somewhat awkward little guy who would present no threat to the powerful oligarchs of the
semibankirshchina (the Seven Bankers) running Russia. Except that he turned out to be one of the most formidable rulers in Russia history. Here is what Putin did as soon as he came to power:
First, he re-established the credibility of the Kremlin with the armed forces and security services by rapidly and effectively crushing the Wahabi insurgency in Chechnia. This established his personal credibility with the people he would have to rely on to deal with the oligarchs.
Second, he used the fact that everybody, every single businessman and corporation in Russia, did more or less break the law during the 1990s, if only because there really was no law. Instead of cracking down on the likes of Berezovski or Khodorkovski for their political activities, he crushed them with (absolutely true) charges of corruption. Crucially, he did that very publicly, sending a clear message to the other arch-enemy: the media.
Third, contrary to the hallucinations of the western human rights agencies and Russian liberals, Putin never directly suppressed any dissent, or cracked down on the media or, even less so, ordered the murder of anybody. He did something much smarter. Remember that modern journalists are first and foremost presstitutes, right? By mercilessly cracking down on the oligarchs Putin deprived the presstitutes of their source of income and political support. Some emigrated to the Ukraine, others simply resigned, and a few were left like on a reservation or a zoo on a few very clearly identifiable media outlets such as Dozhd TV, Ekho Moskvy Radio or the newspaper Kommersant. Those who emigrated became irrelevant, as for those who stayed in the “liberal zoo†– they were harmless has they had no credibility left. Crucially, everybody else “got the messageâ€. After that, all it took is the appointment a few real patriots (such as Dmitri Kiselev, Margarita Simonian and others) in key positions and everybody quickly understood that the winds of fortune had now turned.
Fourth, once the main media outlets were returned back to sanity it did not take too long for the “liberal†(in the Russian sense, meaning pro-USA) parties to enter into a death-spiral from which they have never recovered. That, in turn, resulted in the ejection of all “liberals†form the Duma which now has only 4 parties, all of them more or less “patrioticâ€.
That’s the part that worked.
So far, Putin failed to eject the 5th columnists, whom I call the “Atlantic Integrationists†(for details, including their names, see
here) from the government itself.. Even the notorious
Alexei Kudrin was not fired by Putin, but by Medvedev. The security services succeeded in finally getting rid of
Anatolii Serdyukov but they did not have power needed to put him in jail. I still think that
a purge will happen while
Alexander Mercouris disagrees. Whatever may be the case, what is certain is that Putin has not tackled the 5th columnists in the banking/finance sector and that the latter have being very careful not to give him a pretext to take action against them.
Russia and the USA are very different countries, and no recipe can be simply copied from one to another. Still, there are valuable lessons from the “Putin model†for Trump, not the least of which that his most formidable enemies probably are sitting in the Fed. One Russian analyst – Rostislav Ishchenko – has suggested that Trump could somehow force the Fed to increase interest rates, which would result in a bankruptcy domino effect for US banks which might be the only way to finally crush the Fed and re-take control of US banking. Maybe. I honestly am not qualified to have an opinion about that.
What is sure is that for the time being the USA will continue to look like that:
A homeless man, possibly a veteran, has built a “corridor of flags†to get people to give him money. Florida, October 2016.
Rich on cheapo patriotism and otherwise poor.
Hillary thinks that this is a stunning success. Trump thinks that this is a disgrace. I submit that the choice between these two is really very simple.
To those who are saying that there cannot be a schism in the AngloZionist elites, I will reply that the example of the
conspiracy to prevent Dominique Strauss-Kahn from becoming the next French President shows that, just like hyenas, AngloZionist leaders do sometimes turn on each other. That happens in all regimes, regardless of their political ideology (think SS against SA in Nazi Germany or Trotskists against Stalinists in Boshevik USSR).
Of brooms and body parts
Leon Trotsky used to say the Soviet Russia needed to be cleansed from anarchists and noblemen with an “iron broomâ€. He even wrote an article in the Pravda entitled “We need an iron broomâ€. Another genocidal manic, Felix Derzhinskii, founder of the notorious ChK secret police, used to say that a secret police officer must have a “burning heart, a cool head and clean handsâ€. One would seek weakness, or even compassion, in vain from folks like these. These are ideology-driven “true believersâ€, sociopaths with no sense of empathy, profoundly evil people with a genocidal hatred of anybody standing in their way.
Hillary Clinton and her gang of Neocons are the spiritual (and sometimes even physical) successors of the Soviet Bolsheviks and they, just like their Bolshevik forefathers, will not hesitate for a second to crush their enemies. Donald Trump – assuming he is for real and actually means what he says – has to understand that and do what Putin did: strike first and strike hard. Stalin, by the way, also did exactly that, and for a while the Trotskists were crushed, but in the years following Stalin’s death they gradually bounced back only to seize power again in 1991. I think that the jury is still out on whether Putin will succeed in finally removing the 5th columnist from power. What is sure is that Russia is at least semi-free from the control of these people and that the US is their last bastion right now. Their maniacal hatred of Trump can in part be explained by the sense of danger these folks feel, being threatened for the first time in what they see as their homeland (I don’t mean that in a patriotic sense – but rather like a parasite care for “his†host). And maybe they have some good reason to fear. I sure hope that they do.
I am rather encouraged by the way Trump handled the latest attempt to make him cower in fear. Yesterday Trump dared to declare that since the election might be rigged or stolen he does not pledge to recognize their outcome. And even though every semi-literate person knows that elections in the USA have been rigged and stolen in the past, including Presidential ones, by saying that Trump committed a major case of
crimethink. The Ziomedia pounced on him with self-righteous outrage and put immense pressure on him to retract his statement (which, by the way, contradicted Pence’s stance). Instead of rolling over and recanting his “crimeâ€, Trump replied with this:
Beautiful no? Let’s hope he continues to show the same courage.
Trump is doing now what Jean-Marie Le Pen did in France: he is showing the Neocons that be that he dares to openly defy them, that he refuses to play by their rules, that their outrage has no effect on his and that they don’t get to censor or, even less so, silence him. That is also what he did when, yet again, he refused to accuse the Russians of cyber-attacks and, instead, repeated that it would be a good thing for Russia and the USA to be friends. Again, I am not sure that how long he will be able to hold that line, but for the time being there is no denying that he is openly defying the AngloZionist deep state and Empire.
Conclusion:
The United States are about to enter what might possibly be the deepest and most dangerous crisis of their history. If Trump is elected, he will have to immediately launch a well-planned attack against his opponents without giving them any pretext to accuse him of politically motivated repressions. In Russia, Putin could count on the support of the military and the security services. I don’t know whom Trump can count on, but I am fairly confident that there are still true patriots in the US armed forces. If Trump gets the right person to head the FBI, he might also use that agency to clean house and deliver a steady streams of indictments for corruption, conspiracy to [fill the blank], abuse of authority, obstruction of justice and dereliction of duty, etc. Since such crimes are widespread in the current circles of power, they are also easy to prove and cracking down on corruption would get Trump a standing ovation from the American people. Next, just as Putin in Russia, Trump will have to deal with the media. How exactly, I don’t know. But he will have to face this beast and defeat it. At every step in this process he will have to get the proactive support of the people, just like Putin does. Can he do it?
I don’t know. Honestly, I doubt it. First, I still don’t trust him. But, more relevantly, I would argue that to overthrow the deep state and restore true people power is even harder in the USA than it was in Russia. I have always believed that the AngloZionist Empire will have to be brought down from the outside, most probably by a combination of military and economic defeats. I still believe that. However, I might be wrong – in fact, I hope that I am – and maybe Trump will be the guy to bring down the Empire in order to save the United States. If there is such a possibility, however slim, I think that we have to believe in it and act on it as all the alternatives are far worse.
This article was written for the Unz Review: http://www.unz.com/tsaker/the-us-is-about-to-face-the-worst-crisis-of-its-history-and-how-putins-example-might-inspire-trump/
Click for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French, translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.
What's your response? - Scroll down to add / read comments
Sign up for our FREE Daily Email Newsletter
For
Email Marketing you can trust
Donate
Please read our Comment Policy before posting -
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
Share
Follow the discussion
Comments (46)
Sort by:
7 hours ago
Great article ( as usual by the Saker ) and spot on. If Trump does become Commander in Chief, his first job will be securing his life. Those who really run the show in the US will stop at nothing to safeguard their empire. Truly the US is at a cross roads and by extension the world. Times are really scary.
7 hours ago
1st 100 days in order for Trump:
1. Make the armed services his own: fire every Air Force general, fire every globalist general in the other services.
2. Institute a service wide two week educational training program: The Republic and the Responsibilities of a Soldier.
3. On the 15th day call for a National Day of reaffirmation of a soldier's oath to the Constitution. MSM outlets that refuse to adequately cover the event to have their licenses pulled immediately by Executive Order. All public schools throughout the nation to follow the same 2 week program, no follow through no federal funds, and soldiers and students come together on the 15th day as soldiers reaffirm their oath to the students as parents observe at every public school in the nation.
Now, the Services,the Students, and the Parents are one under the Constitution and the Republic.
4. Next: completely revamp the Justice Department and the FBI with the Services as enforcers.
5. Ask those Congressmen and Senators if they are corrupt. Ask them to voluntarily resign if they are and they will receive leniency. By now they get the picture. Those that do not to face full wrath of the Republic's revamped justice system.
6. Perhaps someone can help we with this step: proper manner to fill the empty seats immediately? Given the nationwide crisis perhaps allowance can be made for calling new elections. Candidates must not have held political office previously. The whole lobbying paradigm completely analyzed and revamped.
7. Finally, clean the intelligence agencies houses from top to bottom. The most difficult task. Perhaps someone can suggest how to do this without truly compromising national security.
And Finally:
8. Do away with the Federal Reserve without the system immediately tanking. Perhaps someone can articulate how this can be done.
There, the first 100 days.
Schlüter · 6 hours ago
Good Analysis, but the comparison can not go too far, inasfar as in Russia the traditional dominance of the political sphere over the (then neoliberal) economy wasn´t too long ago!
My recent post
US „Strategy of Tension“: Killer Clowns, Another „Psy OP“?!
6 hours ago
An excellent, depressing article. Saker says that Trump needs to clear the rot from government. However, I believe we are not dealing with a few at the very top; we have institutionalised corruption from top to bottom, the difference being the size of one’s take – or stake - is determined by position in the hierarchy. Therefore, it is not a fight against individuals per se but against the whole system. And to destroy, and rebuild, the whole system will require a revolution.
Realistic? No. The only possible antidote I can see is, unfortunately, a major economic or military catastrophe. And, despite US indifference, massive "collateral damage†will follow.
6 hours ago
This essay is riddled with factual inaccuracies and historical falsification. For instance, anyone with plain common sense knows Trotskyists didn't take over Russia in 1991. That's for starters. The rest is a swamp.
5 hours ago
Populist movements, national socialist movements, racist anti-establishment movements are all attempts to save capitalism by mobilising the working class to act against their own interests and attack some minority. Trump is simply an amalgam of these movements from which he cherry picks the most popular ideas. His supporters like the author have no real knowledge of history . The fact that such people are given space on ICH makes me worry that we are really heading to more racist fuelled violence.
5 hours ago
Political dynamics in both Russia and the US are far too complex to outline in a short article. Putin, Trump, and Hillary, are not that complex. They are all average people trying to do the right thing, fighting the good fight, picking their battles, taking risks, hoping that they don't hasten Armageddon. I don't think any of the three of them are evil or smart, really just average people who seemed to want to take on the risks and power-trips that comes with leadership. Jill Stein, on the other hand, is a truly exceptional leader who really could make a positive difference.
5 hours ago
Who among us (who are paying attention) could have imagined that things like this would be actually 'on the table' barely a year ago?
We face a very volatile and unpredictable future, and even if Trump has become the only remote possibility that things can change for the better, it's scary as hell. That god-damned media is gonna go all out to crush him, along with all the other nasty constructs that operate with impunity in the good ol' US of A. They can't assassinate him right away, but it's almost bound to happen.
Speaking of which, the Anglo-Zionist network didn't waste no time to bring Dominique Strauss-Kahn down. Zionist Jews won't hesitate to 'out' one of their own if need be, like in holocaustic WWII. The insecure obsession for greed and power knows no limits.
melcdrofla · 5 hours ago
Yes look at all those presidents that have been shot. I would not be surprised if Oboma was warned. Then if you can't beat them join them like that UK Obama, Blair.
4 hours ago
Trump and Hillary are working together to put Hillary in the oval office. It doesn't matter much is the job is essentially just a deep state liaison to the public. In my mind an interesting aspect of the Trump role is the way he is utilized to denigrate so called conspiracy theories. The intended psychology of it is, if trump said it, it must be nonsense. He has, over the course of this dog and pony show, hit on a good deal of them. It is interesting, however, that his presentation of the taboo conspiracy is always dumbed down such that most convincing part of the conspiracy is not mentioned or even hidden. For example his claim that the elections are rigged is explained in the stereotypical republican way which blames racial minorities and immigrants for double voting or voting illegally (which the MSM has correctly said is false) when anyone who has explored the issue knows that in the new century when an election is to be stolen the votes are simply hacked in underfunded precincts of "swing states". Another example are his statements about how Hillary and Obama created ISIS with nary a mention about how this is an ongoing CIA and other alphabet agencies covert mercenary program that predated both of them and is operated without executive perview. Or let us look at the 911 claims made by Trump, he shout its a conspiracy, the Saudi's did it. Your typical disinterested consumer with give it little though aside from, oh yeah those conspiracy theorists are nuts just like Trump, without giving any thought to the most likely suspects which remain the NEOCONS and other parties within the deep state. Trump is a proverbial straw man or red herring upon which the MSM can spin their manufactured consent.
4 hours ago
Maybe he best article I read on this topic in recent times. The Author is very clear about how serious the situation is about the USA of to morrow. In this election you will vote not for a corrupt party, you have to vote for a personality. This election will show us wether the majority of the citizen chose stupidity or reason. I hope reason will prevail otherwise the nation might be doomed.
4 hours ago
"Goys r us' (above ) would seem to be an Australian by his use of the "Good on him" .. Yet another slime bag surfaces but this time an antipodean anti Semite using these pages to slyly chunder up his evil racist spiel.I despise Zionism and zionist jews but hating a whole race is a dangerous and disgusting attitude and only serves to hide the real culprits the capitalist class who are mainly WASPS. .So if I'm right you'll understand this....go forth and multiply, you bludger... you and your kind are not worth a zac probably a descendent of a 'screw' or are you still working as one?.....
3 hours ago
There is no need for "regime change" in Russia. The USSR was overthrown back in 1991 by the US, Gorbachev, Putin, Yeltsin & Co., which created an oligarchy that has remained loyal to the US to this day.
In Syria, Russia and the US are working closely together under a secret agreement to help the SAA, Iranian forces , Hezbollah fighters, ISIS, Al Nursa, i.e., all the "bad guys", kill as many of each other as possible.
When enough of them are dead Putin will pull out, but not before a few unanswered US strikes against Russian forces and a scripted nuclear standoff whereby Russia blinks. It will be the end of Putin's political career as a US puppet. Another yanqui puppet will take his place.
If the Russian working class is not vigilant Putin's successor will reimpose Boris Yeltsin's neoliberal economic shock treatment full throttle.
Writers like Saker and Paul Craig Roberts chirp pro Putin propaganda. But since Putin is a US asset they are actually serving the US. This explains why Saker lives comfortably in Florida (not exactly the kind of place one would expect an enemy of the US to reside). He probably gets a fat US pension.Paul Craig Roberts, who once worked for the US, receives a US pension, but he won't talk about it.
With all the demonization in the MSM about Putin and Russia how is it possible that these two pro Russian mouthpieces continue to live freely and comfortably in the US?
There is only one explanation. They are working for the US.
3 hours ago
Should be "its history".
3 hours ago
Does anyone seriously think that Trump is interestrd in any one but himself? He is without a doubt the most narcissistic person on the national stage. To manipulate him all you have to do is feed his ego. My respect for The Saker's opinion has taken a bit of blow.
3 hours ago
The idea that Trump came across as anything other than a bloviating clown is ridiculous. Hillary Clinton simply barfs up the same pack of demented lies that the US establishment has used to flood the world since they looted the clapped-out Spanish empire, and monkey-boy Trump sputters rubbish about sending her to jail. He's an imbecilic impostor and she's an imbecilic bon fide apparatchik. A totally false binary being sold by the Faker.
2 hours ago
"Monk Monk you go a heavy gang". ( Moenchlein, Moenchlein Du gehst eine schweren Gang)
A famous quote by Georg von Frundsberg When Martin Luther faced his opponents at Worms
in 1521. The constant reppetition of history is uncanny.
jimmymankind · 2 hours ago
whateveah...i want more money and free rent. food stamps and 2,000 a month.
lets get going on that.
universal free health care also. low wages = free medical. we should have no minimum wage, only a MAXIMUM income and direct redistribution of income to the above.
all nukes should be destroyed--right now they are simply objects of fear which cannot be employed for real as the elites do not want to poison their grrrlfriends. sex is too beautiful with models.
sex is the paste that will hold the human race together. sex and basketball.
we are all idiots. there is no hope, only nope. audacity is punishable by death and austerity is normal.
of course, Killery is absurd. as it Trump. they only illustrate the common denomination of all elected officials: the higher the office the more insane the candidates...to choose from.
1 hour ago
Russia needs to bomb and destroy Saudi Arabia. Then the Saudis will sell their US Teasury Bills to recover. China can simultaneously sell their US Treasury bills and spend the money boosting domestic consumers. The rest of the world will have less demand for the US Dollar and move to the Yuan, This will put an end to the US Dollar hegemony.
1 hour ago
Trump is a not-so-slick grifter who blurts random, off-hand remarks most of which he does not stand by, some of which are appealing not only to crackers but to progressives as well. He is not presidential. He is unpredictable. Yet, he does not carry with him a demonstrative record of war crimes.
With Hill-Liar we know what to expect….She’s quite predictable….We can expect further representation of the Energy/Finance Combine, Further deregulation and privatization. Further erosion of middle -class living standards and a continuation and expansion of the blood baths she helped create overseas. Yeh, she knows how to “get things done".
So we are faced with a choice of driving off of a cliff or into a brick wall…..Do we pull the lever for an offensive, rambling, rug salesman with poor taste or do we go with the pandering, union- crushing, neoliberal neo-con who promises and will deliver the TPP, NATO expansion, a Don’t -Fly zone (Escalation) in Syria and unwavering loyalty to Israel over that of the interests of the United States? Moreover, which party imposed that dismal choice on the voting public?
49 minutes ago
http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics...
US between a rock and a hard place
29 minutes ago
State policy cannot change with the change of the white house occupants. And if Trump miraculously (hugely miraculously) wins, give him a few weeks, or even days, to turn around and follow the steps of his predecessors.
25 minutes ago
Trump won't win.
The Democrats control the media and the election process. The outcome is clear.
This all is a farce.
Trump became the Republican candidate to make the voters agree to accept the planned outcome of this 'election'
Better Hillary than this chump might be the idea behind it.
It's not that the voters actually could elect Trump by mistake. As said the voting is under full control and of course rigged.
That's why Russian observers have been already banned. They'd tell the truth about these banana republic voting.
I hope i'm wrong with that opinion, but i guess i'm right on the spot. It's only a show.
10 minutes ago
The US very well may be about to be served up what may turn out to be the worst crisis in its relatively brief history. If so, I think it will most likely come in the form of a false flag op ( a la 9-11) but this time involving many more casualties, multiple major cities, and Western media will be instructed to point the finger at Russia.
And as always, it will be the work of Big Zio, enabled and facilitated by none other than their newly installed Puppet-in-Chief, Hillary.
Sure hope I'm wrong about this, but it appears the elites want a significant worldwide population culling, and sooner than later. They've chosen war as the initial driving force.
If you don't have a "when the SHTF" survival plan, start working on one.
Comment as a Guest, or login:
- Login to IntenseDebate
- Login to WordPress.com
- Login to Twitter
Name
Email
Displayed next to your comments.
Not displayed publicly.
Submit Comment
Subscribe to
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate material will be removed from the site.
The last comments for
The US Is About To Face The Worst Crisis in Their History : Informati
Kurt O
The US very well may be about to be served up what may turn out to be the worst crisis in its relatively...
» 10 minutes ago
The last comments for
By Cooperating With Washington On Syria Russia Walked Into A Trap &nbs
misterg
I am really surprised as I read PRC all the time - he states that Putin will not be able to travel and...
» 18 minutes ago
The last comments for
The US Is About To Face The Worst Crisis in Their History : Informati
H.Kunde
Trump won't win.
The Democrats control the media and the election process. The outcome is clear....
» 25 minutes ago
The last comments for
An All-American Slaughter : Information Clearing House - ICH
Drew
If guns were solely the problem this violence would be more widespread in communities across the US ....
» 28 minutes ago
Comments by
IntenseDebate
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
Privacy Statement