Carol
Grand Slam Champion
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 9,225
- Reactions
- 1,833
- Points
- 113
I'd better say that the ones who think that to play and win the Olympics is a waste of time they are the stupid onesMaybe Fed and Nole are simply stupid.
I'd better say that the ones who think that to play and win the Olympics is a waste of time they are the stupid onesMaybe Fed and Nole are simply stupid.
Every kid dreams of the Olympics, not to mention actual athletes. It doesn't seem that even millionaire tennis players are so cynical that it doesn't make them giddy and emotional. Mastoor seems to have sour grapes, and Ricardo is, well, just generally sour.What's stupid about wanting to be an Olympic gold medal winner?
What "chasm" do you find? Some skipped Rio this year, for various reasons, but who skipped London, if it wasn't for injury? Sure, some might say: no points, no money, no way, if they don't have a medal chance, but who would you say that is? I do think it means a lot to the tennis players.
If I'm honest, I'd be perfectly happy if they made Olympic tennis for the amateurs/futures/qualifiers only. Don't they do football that way? Basketball and golf, too. Give the young people a stage to shine on. But, since it's like this, I do think the players who go love the experience, and appreciate their medals.
But my question was it just Rio? I don't remember loads dropping out of London. Here is the draw...I don't think anyone was missing that wasn't injured:I think it seems to mean a lot to some tennis players... and not to others. There was a laundry list of people dropping out - and those who decided not to make themselves available in the first place... that's your chasm.
But my question was it just Rio? I don't remember loads dropping out of London. Here is the draw...I don't think anyone was missing that wasn't injured:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis_at_the_2012_Summer_Olympics_–_Men's_singles
Kyrgios was basically un-invited by his federation. Berdych and Raonic specifically dropped out citing Zika concerns. Federer was injured, as was Wawrinka. A few others made maybe strategic choices to play events where they would do better without the competition. But I don't think you can make a case for a pattern of tennis players not being interested. I think this year was anomalous for several reasons.
There was a difference:
First, there were points on offer at the London Olympics.
Secondly, it was just after Wimbledon and thirdly it was about 10 days earlier.
Every kid dreams of the Olympics, not to mention actual athletes. It doesn't seem that even millionaire tennis players are so cynical that it doesn't make them giddy and emotional. Mastoor seems to have sour grapes, and Ricardo is, well, just generally sour.
I don't really think any of those points have to do with how much players want to play in the Olympics. If anything, they rather prove my point. I can't believe anyone plays Olympics for the points, first off. Yes, London was more felicitously located, in terms of being in Europe and in the calendar. Also, it had the benefit of not having so many health concerns involved. But they didn't all play London because they wanted more grass time. They played for the excitement of being in the Olympics. I guess we can gauge it better in 2020 when we see how many bother to go to Tokyo. But a lot bothered to go to Beijing in 2008, even though that was across the world, and surely messed with the USOpen swing calendar. I think Rio is a different case, for lots of reasons, and I wouldn't base your notion of players' commitment to the Olympic experience based on this year.
Nole have the right to be injured too...he's well prepared but he played a lot in first part of the season, especially when he finally won RG so maybe his body needs some rest