Wouldn't be a GS if there wasn't a brawl in the stands now, right? Ah, if we could only go back to the good old days, where people applauded politely for winners, and players exchanged a handshake rather than something that looked like an arm wrestle after the match
But that would be asking for too much, huh?
Don’t forget the shoddy condition of the grass!Brawl? I'd never point fingers at any other major musing about violence! It's a shame a stray bullet came flying into Forest Hills exacerbated their move to Flushing Meadows! Then of course there was the unfortunate tourist m#rd@r in the Subway off the facility decades ago! I'm surprised The USO hasn't taken a bigger hit as one of the worst events run out there! The scheduling of matches was criminal at times! The stories I could tell you going back to the 70's!
Whether you like it or not, this is not about geopolitics, in general. It's specific. Tennis has taken a stand on the war in Ukraine. They have banned Russian and Belarusian flags at the AO (and on many websites,) and those countries' players from Wimbledon. I've already said I don't agree with a lot of these choices, but who cares what I think? Point is, that Novak's father had the choice to pass those protesters by, or join them. It can't have escaped his notice that it's an unpopular opinion, in the tennis world, and he could have done his son a favor by staying agnostic and walking right on by. His decision was a PR snafu for Novak, whether you think that's fair, or not. Sure, who cares what Srdjan Djokovic thinks about Russia? But it didn't help his son's cause, in terms of general sympathies.Really, who cares? People have a range of political beliefs, and there's not one singular narrative that we must all abide by - unless, of course, you buy the narrative of the mainstream.
I mean, shouldn't the people protesting this also protest the American flag? The US has invaded far more countries than Russia, and killed far more people (at least post-Stalin).
Your point is taken and I can agree that Srdjan isn't doing Novak any favors as far as PR is concerned. I just dislike the double-standard that exists because of media bias and propaganda.Whether you like it or not, this is not about geopolitics, in general. It's specific. Tennis has taken a stand on the war in Ukraine. They have banned Russian and Belarusian flags at the AO (and on many websites,) and those countries' players from Wimbledon. I've already said I don't agree with a lot of these choices, but who cares what I think? Point is, that Novak's father had the choice to pass those protesters by, or join them. It can't have escaped his notice that it's an unpopular opinion, in the tennis world, and he could have done his son a favor by staying agnostic and walking right on by. His decision was a PR snafu for Novak, whether you think that's fair, or not. Sure, who cares what Srdjan Djokovic thinks about Russia? But it didn't help his son's cause, in terms of general sympathies.
Bolded is for AP, or for all of us?My young Aussie WC Kubler and Hijikata are aiming to become the 14th all Australian team to win an Australian Mens doubles title in the Open Era.Their match will be played after the Womens final on Saturday ( which is today).
Honestly, he's in Australia, and his son is in the final. It seems to me that one "time-out" is enough, as long as he minds his Ps and Qs.Well there are still calls for Novak's father to stay at his hotel and watch the mens final so I guess we will see if that unfolds.
He has apologized, calls are coming from the Ukrainian Ambassador to Australia for one, who dosent believe he should be at the final, it has stirred up a lot of anger, not only in Melbourne, but also here in Sydney.Honestly, he's in Australia, and his son is in the final. It seems to me that one "time-out" is enough, as long as he minds his Ps and Qs.
Honestly not hammering on you, but genuinely curious...your last sentence has a bit to unpack. What do you think the media bias is, in this case? What IS the propaganda? If you by mean "double-standard" that the US or other countries are not called out for sins, I think you stretch a point too thin, in terms of the AO 2023. If you mean, as I think someone pointed out on these forums at one time, why weren't US players sanctioned when, say, the US invaded Iraq? I'd say that's a fair question, and qualifies as a double-standard. But I'm not clear that exists due to "media bias and propaganda." It's much more complicated than that, and murky business. The world in general, and tennis in particular (for our purposes) has taken a stand against Russia/Putin on this war. Are you thinking that we should look at the Russian side of the story, or just that the Russian and Belarusian players in tennis are being unfairly singled out? On the latter, I would agree with you.Your point is taken and I can agree that Srdjan isn't doing Novak any favors as far as PR is concerned. I just dislike the double-standard that exists because of media bias and propaganda.
Wow, that's a lot of International intrigue. Tennis Australia must be wondering when it became an arm of the Foreign Service, huh?He has apologized, calls are coming from the Ukrainian Ambassador to Australia for one, who dosent believe he should be at the final, it has stirred up a lot of anger, not only in Melbourne, but also here in Sydney.
To be fair, TA outlined before the AO started to the players, coaches, families, the protocols in place regarding Russian and Belarusian flags, still some fans brought them in, they have been dealt with, then Novak's father with Pro Russian fan on video mind you? TA also warned Novak's father about the video, they didnt tell him he could not attend the SF, that was his choice, which I feel at the time was the correct choice.In the current climate of this war in Ukraine,it just takes one instance, like what happened at the AO, the other day, for people to come out with their strong opinions. I understand their point of view.Wow, that's a lot of International intrigue. Tennis Australia must be wondering when it became an arm of the Foreign Service, huh?
LOL. Double standards? Gasp, gambling in Casablanca. ; )Your point is taken and I can agree that Srdjan isn't doing Novak any favors as far as PR is concerned. I just dislike the double-standard that exists because of media bias and propaganda.
That is precisely what Novak’s dad knew his actions would provoke. He is the father of who will soon return to being the #1 player in the world, he knows that alot of Serbia’s European neighbors ( Poland, Slovenia, etc) tensions are running high on the Russian invasion. To say he used his visibility as Novak’s dad to stir the hornet’s nest isnt IMO a stretch.He has apologized, calls are coming from the Ukrainian Ambassador to Australia for one, who dosent believe he should be at the final, it has stirred up a lot of anger, not only in Melbourne, but also here in Sydney.
As I said to @El Dude above, I wonder if tennis isn't wishing they'd never waded into this in the first place. If they'd always treated tennis players as individual contractors, which they are, there might be no Russian protests outside at the AO. Sure, some Ukrainian flags on hats, and even Russian players signing for "peace" on the lens, which I think Rublev did, but no need for major political kerfuffles. I'm pretty sure that tennis opened a can of worms they wish they never had.To be fair, TA outlined before the AO started to the players, coaches, families, the protocols in place regarding Russian and Belarusian flags, still some fans brought them in, they have been dealt with, then Novak's father with Pro Russian fan on video mind you? TA also warned Novak's father about the video, they didnt tell him he could not attend the SF, that was his choice, which I feel at the time was the correct choice.In the current climate of this war in Ukraine,it just takes one instance, like what happened at the AO, the other day, for people to come out with their strong opinions. I understand their point of view.