GameSetAndMath said:
Riotbeard said:
TennisFanatic7 said:
For a guy who has now won 9 titles and twice reached a Masters 1000 final, and enjoyed a top 20 seeding for most of the last four years, I think it's fair enough to say he should have done better in the majors than a single QF appearance and a W/L record of 35-25.
For a guy who serves as big as Isner, it's quite shocking that he's actually lost more matches than he's won at Wimbledon in particular with a record of 5-6.
In general, I agree, but I think that assumes all bodies are built the same. I think his physical limitations are most dramatic at slams, and that's why his best of 5 record is worse than his best of 3.
Physical limitations? Isn't this the guy who was involved in a three day long match
in Wimbledon and won it as well. Most matches are played in about less than half of
the time that match took.
I didn't get to watch much of that match, so I won't comment, but I watch a good amount of isner, and playing tennis, lateral movement in particular takes a lot out of him. Height like that makes side to side movement pretty exhausting. He also has a wider frame in general. He carries a lot of weight with him. I think he about hit his ceiling, might get a masters.