MargaretMcAleer
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2013
- Messages
- 48,100
- Reactions
- 31,523
- Points
- 113
I had projected Sinner and Alcaraz to meet in the final, pity it didnt happen, at least both players werent in the same side of the draw this time
Oh I agree Rios was more talented, gifted & explosive than Zverev. Come to think of it, I can come up with at least a dozen players I would place as “better” than Zverev. (Nalbandian to name one)Rios is hands down the best non major winner.
For obvious reasons. He was troubling Nadal, for sure.You surely recall that particular match way better than I do.
I probably sell Zverev short on some of his talents, but I don't think his game or his attitude has changed markedly, at all. Young, talented players can be dangerous in a kind of way at 19, that they may cease to be, when they have more to protect, but other than that, I still think he's always lacked something in the trouser dept.But I should have written "before that match against Nadal". Because I do remember some matches were he displayed more... more "blood in his eyes" as we say here in Brazil.
But now that I am thinking of it, maybe his "transformation " into this boring (but efficient) player occurred before the injury. I remember when he was still up and coming, I was watching he playing Murray and I thought "this kid moves pretty well for a big guy, actually he moves well, period". I would have never say that nowadays....
This, exactly. Rios, Mecir, and Nalbandian might have been more talented, but Zverev has had the much better career. In that sense, I sort of see "greatness" as actualized talent, so Zverev is "greater" than those guys.Oh I agree Rios was more talented, gifted & explosive than Zverev. Come to think of it, I can come up with at least a dozen players I would place as “better” than Zverev. (Nalbandian to name one)
My context was actual career record history, aka 3 Major finals, 7 Masters wins, YE’s as top 5, top 10, weeks as a top 4 ranking, etc. Zverev’s record bests quite a few even multiple Slam winners.
Moxie,For obvious reasons. He was troubling Nadal, for sure.
I probably sell Zverev short on some of his talents, but I don't think his game or his attitude has changed markedly, at all. Young, talented players can be dangerous in a kind of way at 19, that they may cease to be, when they have more to protect, but other than that, I still think he's always lacked something in the trouser dept.
and so what does Alexander have to do to improve his game, according to you ?For obvious reasons. He was troubling Nadal, for sure.
I probably sell Zverev short on some of his talents, but I don't think his game or his attitude has changed markedly, at all. Young, talented players can be dangerous in a kind of way at 19, that they may cease to be, when they have more to protect, but other than that, I still think he's always lacked something in the trouser dept.
As I said to @mrzz above, he has more talents than I give him credit for, (his serve and bh are huge weapons.) He's obviously nearly good enough for the big moment, so in my humble opinion, what he needs is an attitude change. More humility in the face of adversity. A never-say-die-attitude. The ability to change something that's not working, even mid-match. I believe this is why many suggest he needs a coaching change. Time to try that.and so what does Alexander have to do to improve his game, according to you ?
Oh boy I simply forgot about Nalbandian, and he was my second favorite player for a long while.This, exactly. Rios, Mecir, and Nalbandian might have been more talented, but Zverev has had the much better career. In that sense, I sort of see "greatness" as actualized talent, so Zverev is "greater" than those guys.
Oh boy I simply forgot about Nalbandian, and he was my second favorite player for a long while.
But Rios got the #1, and at the time everyone agreed he was the best player in the world. The lack of a major was a problem, yes, but people either thought he would get one eventually, or put this in the account of his "I don't give a fuck" mentality... Zverev full career is definitely better but I don't think he ever got to that place of being "the guy" as Rios did.
Zverev hasn’t got the head for big finals. He’s too one dimensional, as well, so when he’s stressed he can’t improvise, when he’s losing he has no great ability to switch and hang on. He’s too predictable. I’d say Sinner knew early on he’d get a lot of chances to taut the first set, and once he won that set, it was only an academic exercise to watch the rest of it, one which I bailed on in favour of a stroll around the botanic gardens..As I said to @mrzz above, he has more talents than I give him credit for, (his serve and bh are huge weapons.) He's obviously nearly good enough for the big moment, so in my humble opinion, what he needs is an attitude change. More humility in the face of adversity. A never-say-die-attitude. The ability to change something that's not working, even mid-match. I believe this is why many suggest he needs a coaching change. Time to try that.
Front remembers that match fondly, too, and brings is up periodically. It looked like Zverev had a chance v. Nadal. Remember he had match up bonuses v. Nadal - height left him less troubled by high-bouncing balls, and 2HBH helped him to control the spin, and at shoulder height. And he was playing with purpose and confidence that fortnight. Not different in terms of technique. But he was no closer, in the big matches. It was hard to be too worried.@Moxie , I checked some old videos and my realized my memory played a trick on me. You are right, there is little difference between the Zverev of old and the current one. One flash here or there, but I surely had selective memory on this one.
Having said, I will try to find a complete tape of that Zverev Nadal injury match. I simply cannot comprehend it right now.
Oh boy I simply forgot about Nalbandian, and he was my second favorite player for a long while.
But Rios got the #1, and at the time everyone agreed he was the best player in the world. The lack of a major was a problem, yes, but people either thought he would get one eventually, or put this in the account of his "I don't give a fuck" mentality... Zverev full career is definitely better but I don't think he ever got to that place of being "the guy" as Rios did.
Rios was a brief nova (but not a supernova). He really only had one "elite" year and top 10 for fourish. I definitely agree that, at his best, he was a more brilliant player than Zverev. But "floor" matters too, and ultimately greatness has to come down to more than "how good was a guy when he played his best?" Otherwise we end up in Nalbandian = GOAT insanity.Oh boy I simply forgot about Nalbandian, and he was my second favorite player for a long while.
But Rios got the #1, and at the time everyone agreed he was the best player in the world. The lack of a major was a problem, yes, but people either thought he would get one eventually, or put this in the account of his "I don't give a fuck" mentality... Zverev full career is definitely better but I don't think he ever got to that place of being "the guy" as Rios did.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Miami Open, Miami, FL, 2025 - ATP 1000 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 140 | |
![]() |
BNP Paribas Open, Indian Wells, CA, 2025 - ATP Masters 1000 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 219 | |
![]() |
Australian Open 2025 - Men's Draw Challenge | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 4 | |
![]() |
Australian Open 2025 [Men] - Grand Slam | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 478 | |
![]() |
2025 Rankings Game! | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 11 |