I didn’t see it either but Danii describes it as a 12 out of 10 performance, which is great for him. Good to see him back at this level, reaching a slam final. The lack of expectancy around him seems to have benefited him…What happened last night?. Heard Meddy played lights out and very offensive last night.
Damn right Kieran. No demonstrably demanding love from the crowd so they would cheer him on.Okay, I’m gonna sound like an old crank here but it’s becoming a pet peeve of mine when players gesture to the crowd after a point, telling them ‘look what I just done, people - praise me!’
Carlos does it after highlight reel points and it shows a little swagger, he’s like a strutting cock with his finger behind his ear - ‘I can’t hear you!’ - but it’s overdone now. Ben Shelton was doing it endlessly, Danii does it often, flapping his arms like a desperate chickens wings, ‘raise the volume for me, people, don’t you understand what you’re seeing!’
Leave the crowd alone. They know what they’re seeing. They’ll cheer when they want. I know the crowd respond to this shit too but watching the old Sampras videos that @Vince Evert put up elsewhere, I was reminded of how classy he was, no fuss no muss, no self-aggrandising, no neediness, no care in the world if the crowd loved him or hated him. He didn’t need their love. He’d win a big point, maybe fist pump, maybe not, then slouch across to start the next point, his tongue hanging loose.
Rafa was the same. Look at my profile pic. The crowd went wild but Rafa wasn’t fist pumping for the benefit of the crowd. He’s couldn’t care less it they were booing him. He was in his own world battling to win…
Yes! Federer loves himself so much he didn’t have room for any more. If he was gelato, he’d lick himself to death…Damn right Kieran. No demonstrably demanding love from the crowd so they would cheer him on.
Have to admit even Federer didnt resort to those histrionics to get the crowd to cheer him on.
Hmm..though Federer always had the crowd in his corner anyways so there was no need to ask for their support. So in Fed’s case never mind.
Dang, even when I intend to give Federer a compliment it backfires on me.
It started out all Carlitos, and Meddie looked nervous and overmatched. Hadn't got his serve working. But he broke back with Carlos being a bit sloppy, then finally played a great tie-break, and it felt liked he stolen a set that was destined to go to Alcaraz. However, momentum and form shifted drastically at the start of the 2nd. Medvedev continued his great form from the latter part of the first/tb in the first, and Carlitos had rather come back to earth. Medvedev was very impressive. He was offensive...for Medvedev. But he had some miraculous passing shots, too.What happened last night?. Heard Meddy played lights out and very offensive last night.
It can be read otherwise. He was in a position like no other to act like a "maestro". If he would raise his pinky finger a millimeter after one his many great points, the crowd would go wild for ten minutes. So, nobody ever had the incentive he had, and still...Damn right Kieran. No demonstrably demanding love from the crowd so they would cheer him on.
Have to admit even Federer didnt resort to those histrionics to get the crowd to cheer him on.
Hmm..though Federer always had the crowd in his corner anyways so there was no need to ask for their support. So in Fed’s case never mind.
Dang, even when I intend to give Federer a compliment it backfires on me.
There were no breaks of serve in the first set. They each held serve to get it to the tiebreak. Alcaraz only broke once, in the third set. (He was 1/9 BP conversion — a terrible stat)It started out all Carlitos, and Meddie looked nervous and overmatched. Hadn't got his serve working. But he broke back with Carlos being a bit sloppy, then finally played a great tie-break, and it felt liked he stolen a set that was destined to go to Alcaraz.
Medvedev serve well and clutch in the 1st two sets of the match.There were no breaks of serve in the first set. They each held serve to get it to the tiebreak. Alcaraz only broke once, in the third set. (He was 1/9 BP conversion — a terrible stat)
It can be read otherwise. He was in a position like no other to act like a "maestro". If he would raise his pinky finger a millimeter after one his many great points, the crowd would go wild for ten minutes. So, nobody ever had the incentive he had, and still...
So you actually gave Federer a giant compliment.
That tells you how much I was sure the break was coming for Carlos during much of that first set. LOL!There were no breaks of serve in the first set. They each held serve to get it to the tiebreak. Alcaraz only broke once, in the third set. (He was 1/9 BP conversion — a terrible stat)
View attachment 8795
I missed it too, but am not surprised Charlie lost. I said in the QF that the kid had to be at 90% to even tangle w/ Meddy on HC. 1/9 BPs against the elite is not going to get it done. Not converting those BPs bleed into other parts of his game.What happened last night?. Heard Meddy played lights out and very offensive last night.
Yes, his BP conversion was bad.I missed it too, but am not surprised Charlie lost. I said in the QF that the kid had to be at 90% to even tangle w/ Meddy on HC. 1/9 BPs against the elite is not going to get it done. Not converting those BPs bleed into other parts of his game.
That part of the match when Alcaraz made a few passing shots with fh dtl was just wow. Yeah, Meddy was really offensive, I think that was a major difference this time they played. Basically you can't win against Alcaraz with defensive play only like Meddy tried before and failed.It started out all Carlitos, and Meddie looked nervous and overmatched. Hadn't got his serve working. But he broke back with Carlos being a bit sloppy, then finally played a great tie-break, and it felt liked he stolen a set that was destined to go to Alcaraz. However, momentum and form shifted drastically at the start of the 2nd. Medvedev continued his great form from the latter part of the first/tb in the first, and Carlitos had rather come back to earth. Medvedev was very impressive. He was offensive...for Medvedev. But he had some miraculous passing shots, too.
That part of the match when Alcaraz made a few passing shots with fh dtl was just wow. Yeah, Meddy was really offensive, I think that was a major difference this time they played. Basically you can't win against Alcaraz with defensive play only like Meddy tried before and failed.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
2023 US Open F: Djokovic vs. Medvedev | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 664 | ||
2023 US Open SF: Djokovic vs. Shelton | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 343 | ||
US Open 2023 [Men] - Grand Slam | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 1022 | ||
Roland Garros / French Open 2023 [Men] - Grand Slam | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 2378 | ||
Mutua Madrid Open, Madrid, Spain, 2023 - Masters 1000 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 321 |