At certain angles, Rublev looks like Gollum, in LOTR. Dimitrov shouldn't have dropped that set, and he'll be regretting it in the end, win or lose.
I get what you're saying, Dude, about certain characteristics seeming to hold water across national lines. But it doesn't really mean everything in an individual sport. (Americans don't win on clay: Courier, Agassi; Spaniards don't win on grass: Nadal.) You get my point.
Good to see you around, Chewy!More Gollum than Sidious. Good call.
Thanks, Moxie! Question...How do guys like Luckas Lacko, among others, qualify for majors? It seems as if guys like him rarely play other tournaments. Not singling out Lacko. There are others. Just wondering how those guys can qualify for majors when you never hear of them playing lower level events.Good to see you around, Chewy!
Oh my god, @Fiero425, I remember that show! I was 8-9 in 1982, but I remember loving it. Didn't it just go for one season?
Key word is "qualify." They have to be high enough ranked to be admitted to the qualifying rounds, so Lacko has been lurking around at lower level events, for sure. But then they play 3 qualifying rounds at Majors. They have the opportunity to qualify at other events, as well. And it's not like we've never seen Lacko. His career high ranking is 44.Thanks, Moxie! Question...How do guys like Luckas Lacko, among others, qualify for majors? It seems as if guys like him rarely play other tournaments. Not singling out Lacko. There are others. Just wondering how those guys can qualify for majors when you never hear of them playing lower level events.
Forgive me for not checking (I'm lazy), but is Lacko a qualifier? Did he make the main draw by making it through the qualifying rounds? Again...I'm not picking on Lacko. I follow tennis, even the 250s, the best I can. I rarely, if ever, see guys like him in the main draws. How do they keep their rankings high enough to get into the main draws of majors?Key word is "qualify." They have to be high enough ranked to be admitted to the qualifying rounds, so Lacko has been lurking around at lower level events, for sure. But then they play 3 qualifying rounds at Majors. They have the opportunity to qualify at other events, as well. And it's not like we've never seen Lacko. His career high ranking is 44.
He's currently ranked 86, so he must have qualified.Forgive me for not checking (I'm lazy), but is Lacko a qualifier? Did he make the main draw by making it through the qualifying rounds?
Forgive me for not checking (I'm lazy), but is Lacko a qualifier? Did he make the main draw by making it through the qualifying rounds? Again...I'm not picking on Lacko. I follow tennis, even the 250s, the best I can. I rarely, if ever, see guys like him in the main draws. How do they keep their rankings high enough to get into the main draws of majors?
Ifhink you are talking about Lu. There is a difference between Lu and Lacko in terms of Lu is more of a permanent resident of the top 100, residing in the 50-80 area most of the time, while Lacko is more of a 80-120 range player.There are a few of these guys that hang around and actually prefer to compete on the challenger tour. It’s easier to get the necessary points for a 128 major draw. ATP 250 events feature 32 player draws or less of course.
The other player that comes to mind is this Taiwanese player Lee or something.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
J | If back in 2018… | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 43 | |
BMW Open 2018, Munich, Germany, ATP 250 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 53 | ||
Australian Open Final 2018: Federer v Cilic | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 1176 | ||
AUSTRALIAN OPEN 2018 Mens Draw Prediction Challenge ATP | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 48 | ||
2018 Australian Open - Early Chatter | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 298 |