RJD11 said:"I should not be nervous because it's not my first time to play the semifinals," Li said. "But when I walked on court, I was feeling the court was so big. It felt like a football [field]. To Serena, it was table tennis. I could not focus."
Here’s the first set stat line. Blink and you missed it. All of it.
Serena: 1 ace, 3 double faults, winning 85 percent first serves, 4 winners, 9 unforced errors, 3-for-3 on break points, 3-for-4 at the net.
Li: 0 aces, 3 double faults, winning 43 percent first serves, just 25 percent on second serves, 1 winner, 12 unforced errors, 0-for-3 at the net.
tented said:RJD11 said:"I should not be nervous because it's not my first time to play the semifinals," Li said. "But when I walked on court, I was feeling the court was so big. It felt like a football [field]. To Serena, it was table tennis. I could not focus."
Here’s the first set stat line. Blink and you missed it. All of it.
Serena: 1 ace, 3 double faults, winning 85 percent first serves, 4 winners, 9 unforced errors, 3-for-3 on break points, 3-for-4 at the net.
Li: 0 aces, 3 double faults, winning 43 percent first serves, just 25 percent on second serves, 1 winner, 12 unforced errors, 0-for-3 at the net.
Thanks for the stats, RJD11.
I knew Li Na's numbers would be bad, but they're even worse than I suspected.
Ironically, what stands out the most (to me) is Serena hitting only one ace. It seemed like she was serving better than that. But 85% first serve points won? Incredible number.
tented said:RJD11 said:"I should not be nervous because it's not my first time to play the semifinals," Li said. "But when I walked on court, I was feeling the court was so big. It felt like a football [field]. To Serena, it was table tennis. I could not focus."
Here’s the first set stat line. Blink and you missed it. All of it.
Serena: 1 ace, 3 double faults, winning 85 percent first serves, 4 winners, 9 unforced errors, 3-for-3 on break points, 3-for-4 at the net.
Li: 0 aces, 3 double faults, winning 43 percent first serves, just 25 percent on second serves, 1 winner, 12 unforced errors, 0-for-3 at the net.
Thanks for the stats, RJD11.
I knew Li Na's numbers would be bad, but they're even worse than I suspected.
Ironically, what stands out the most (to me) is Serena hitting only one ace. It seemed like she was serving better than that. But 85% first serve points won? Incredible number.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
WTA Taipei 2013: OEC Open | Pro Tennis (Womens) | 3 | ||
2013 US Open Final: Serena vs. Vika | Pro Tennis (Womens) | 782 | ||
2013 US Open QF: Serena vs. Suarez Navarro | Pro Tennis (Womens) | 36 | ||
2013 French Open Final: Serena vs. Masha | Pro Tennis (Womens) | 87 | ||
2013 French Open QF: Serena vs. Sveta | Pro Tennis (Womens) | 54 |