Unstoppable Force: Novak Djokovic wins in Shanghai

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
27,403
Reactions
6,211
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
novak-djokovic2.jpg


World Number One Novak Djokovic won his third Shanghai title by mauling French ace Jo-Wilfried Tsonga 6-2 6-4.

It took just 78 minutes for the Serb to land his 25th ATP Masters 1000 title, surpassing Roger Federer and closing in on the record of 27 currently held by Rafael Nadal.

Djokovic began the match like a runaway train, breaking Tsonga in the opening stanza and then moved up a double break in the third game. Tsonga stemmed the tide with a break of his own but couldn’t consolidate and was broken back immediately. The remainder of the set went with serve with Djokovic taking it 6-2.

Tsonga worked his way back into the match in the second set, protecting his serve well and going toe for toe with the defending champion to 4-4.

Djokovic broke the deadlock in the 9th game, breaking the Tsonga serve and wrapped up the championship with an exquisite backhand cushioned shot.

China is becoming a land of rich reward for Djokovic. He is a perfect 10/10 on winning tournaments on visits to the Eastern powerhouse.

Photo: Marianne Bevis (Creative Commons License)
 

Billie

Nole fan
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
5,330
Reactions
850
Points
113
Location
Canada
BB, did you mean Beijing as Nole won only 3 Shanghai masters and they were not consecutive.

Another amazing stat:

Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.
 

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
27,403
Reactions
6,211
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
8551 said:
BB, did you mean Beijing as Nole won only 3 Shanghai masters and they were not consecutive. Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.

Oops, I used the other post as a template to begin the post (and left that in by mistake - thanks for spotting it!)
 

calitennis127

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
4,947
Reactions
459
Points
83
8551 said:
Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.

And yet, Broken and Moxie (and Kieran) think that there is nothing questionable about him and Nadal have the same number of US Open titles.

 
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
NOLE -- congrats, congrats, congrats ...

 

and to his team , his wife and family and friends and Serbia and his fans - including me -

 

for another superb run to yet another title! what an accomplishment.

NOVAK said he himself was very satisfied with his 2 weeks so far - because of the consistency he produced - mentally, physically - competitively and emotionally - very steady , very high intensity level - and "didn't feel tired" ..

 

i think at this point in their careers - NOLE is just that notch above anyone - including his closest Great rivals - and it just shows that Nole's own dedication and professionalism to try and improve every aspect of his game brings the results that can't be questioned.

 

in their own turns in years past -- RAFA - also a big favorite of mine -- and ROGER that we call can admire regardless of being his fan or not -- as the DOMINANT players of their generation since 2003 of ROGER's rise --

also deserved their well-earned turns as the best in the tour, with results , against rivals, and in historical records.

 

NOW -- it has been NOLE's turn for quite a few years continuous...and his ''entry" into the historical ''all-time greats"

 

imo, is as unquestionable as anyone's.

 

SOME OF THE chinese fans , reportedly -- even RENAMED themselves with SERBIAN names =-= in honor of NOLE.

 

how's THAT for WINNING not JUST TITLES -- BUT ''hearts and minds" , eh?

:yahoo: :good:

 
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
ABOUT AS EASILY as against ANDY . simply amazing.

right now - or at least in the last 3 years - it's been NOLE having a singularly dominant record against his chief rivals...

 

Roger, Rafa, Andy.

 

and THAT is nothing to sneeze at.

 

yet -- with all that phenomenal record making of his own -- in all these years -- ONE THING has been consistent with nole - whether in his losses (relatively few but sometimes prompting people a year or so ago to question him "he has lost more GS finals..what;s going on?") -- or his victories --

 

there was always the DIGNIFIED NOLE. never making excuses for himself, always praising his conquerors whoever they are...and never full of himself when winning...

 

and unforgettably: when "not the favorite and darling" in US open FINALS over Roger..

 

GRACIOUS - . just as in FO devastatingly disappointing loss to STAN.

 

nole IS not just a great tennis athlete and champion -- in sports -- he is TRULY  a genuine GENTLEMAN.
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,626
Reactions
14,784
Points
113
8601 said:
Billie wrote:
Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.
And yet, Broken and Moxie (and Kieran) think that there is nothing questionable about him and Nadal have the same number of US Open titles.

I won't speak for anyone else, but I'm not sure what you mean by us thinking that there is nothing "questionable" about Nole and Rafa having the same number of USO titles.  Why should there be?  Rafa won the USO 2x when he was the best player at the time, as did Nole.
 

isabelle

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
4,673
Reactions
634
Points
113
Congrats to Nole and Billie !!
 

Mastoor

Major Winner
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
1,723
Reactions
470
Points
83
While for the tennis fans around the world this is the year of Novak Djokovic, in Chinese horoscope this is the Year of the G.O.A.T.  :)

 

 
 

brokenshoelace

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
9,380
Reactions
1,334
Points
113
8601 said:
Billie wrote:
Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.
And yet, Broken and Moxie (and Kieran) think that there is nothing questionable about him and Nadal have the same number of US Open titles.

Glad to see you haven't gained an ounce of sensibility since our last argument.

Just a few days ago, I said Djokovic is a vastly superior hard court player who, on his best day, will beat Nadal's best on the surface. By saying he's "vastly" superior, I concede that he should have the results to prove it (and outside of the US Open, he does).

What I don't find questionable, is one particular loss to Nadal in the US Open final in 2013, due to the context at that time. I never said Novak should only have one or two US Open titles, and I never said he should have lost as many finals in New York. In fact, I clearly highlighted his 2012 US Open loss to Murray (just a few days ago, in a post directed at you) as a bad performance that he should be disappointed with. Meaning he should have won. Meaning he should have more US Open titles. Meaning you're still willfully obtuse just to fabricate narratives.

Match results are not measured in context with historical proficiency on a surface, otherwise Nadal should be ashamed to lose to anyone on clay, ever, since his resume on that surface vastly dwarves anyone else's.
 

Denis

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
6,067
Reactions
691
Points
113
8697 said:
Calitennis127 wrote:
<blockquote>
Billie wrote:
Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.
And yet, Broken and Moxie (and Kieran) think that there is nothing questionable about him and Nadal have the same number of US Open titles.</blockquote>
Glad to see you haven’t gained an ounce of sensibility since our last argument. Just a few days ago, I said Djokovic is a vastly superior hard court player who, on his best day, will beat Nadal’s best on the surface. By saying he’s “vastly” superior, I concede that he should have the results to prove it (and outside of the US Open, he does). What I don’t find questionable, is one particular loss to Nadal in the US Open final in 2013, due to the context at that time. I never said Novak should only have one or two US Open titles, and I never said he should have lost as many finals in New York. In fact, I clearly highlighted his 2012 US Open loss to Murray (just a few days ago, in a post directed at you) as a bad performance that he should be disappointed with. Meaning he should have won. Meaning he should have more US Open titles. Meaning you’re still willfully obtuse just to fabricate narratives. Match results are not measured in context with historical proficiency on a surface, otherwise Nadal should be ashamed to lose to anyone on clay, ever, since his resume on that surface vastly dwarves anyone else’s.

I would agree with this. Of all the final losses 2012 is the most disappointing one. Nadal was on fire that late summer in 2013, he took it (serve was working particularly well). I think 2010 was also a bit questionable due to the schedueling of the semis and the final.
 

ClayDeath

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
4,800
Reactions
241
Points
63
Location
Gulf Coast
I said long ago at MTF that djokovic was going to be an all time great.

and they laughed at me.

it is funny how I always get the last laugh.

djokovic said he was going to outwork everyone on the planet. that is what he did and that is what he is doing.
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,626
Reactions
14,784
Points
113
8709 said:
Broken_shoelace wrote:
<blockquote>
Calitennis127 wrote:
<blockquote>
Billie wrote:
Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.
And yet, Broken and Moxie (and Kieran) think that there is nothing questionable about him and Nadal have the same number of US Open titles.</blockquote>
Glad to see you haven’t gained an ounce of sensibility since our last argument. Just a few days ago, I said Djokovic is a vastly superior hard court player who, on his best day, will beat Nadal’s best on the surface. By saying he’s “vastly” superior, I concede that he should have the results to prove it (and outside of the US Open, he does). What I don’t find questionable, is one particular loss to Nadal in the US Open final in 2013, due to the context at that time. I never said Novak should only have one or two US Open titles, and I never said he should have lost as many finals in New York. In fact, I clearly highlighted his 2012 US Open loss to Murray (just a few days ago, in a post directed at you) as a bad performance that he should be disappointed with. Meaning he should have won. Meaning he should have more US Open titles. Meaning you’re still willfully obtuse just to fabricate narratives. Match results are not measured in context with historical proficiency on a surface, otherwise Nadal should be ashamed to lose to anyone on clay, ever, since his resume on that surface vastly dwarves anyone else’s.</blockquote>
I would agree with this. Of all the final losses 2012 is the most disappointing one. Nadal was on fire that late summer in 2013, he took it (serve was working particularly well). I think 2010 was also a bit questionable due to the schedueling of the semis and the final.

I think you forgot that, while Djokovic had the tougher semi, by a lot, the final the next day was rained out, thus giving Novak an extra day's rest, which was seen as a leveler.  At that point, probably Novak just wasn't ready to beat Federer, then Nadal on the trot.  Also, Nadal was having a great tournament.  He hadn't dropped a set until the final.  I don't see anything questionable there.
 

Billie

Nole fan
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
5,330
Reactions
850
Points
113
Location
Canada
8601 said:
Billie wrote:
Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.
And yet, Broken and Moxie (and Kieran) think that there is nothing questionable about him and Nadal have the same number of US Open titles.

Well, Rafa first made the final in 2010 and Nole did it in 2007.   Frankly you can't exclude number of finals as if that is not a good result.  Yes Nole had some tough times at the end of the slam season due to scheduling, weather, it is tough to win it if you play the whole season and go deep in every tournament.  Nadal made 2 finals in all of his years as a professional and won them both.  He perhaps got a bit lucky and every player needs that.  I have no doubt that if Nole had to play 4 days out of the last 5 (like in 2012), or had physical difficulties (like in 2013), or had to play in 100 degree weather like in 2014, this year, he probably wouldn't have won it past September.   People sometimes act as if anybody should win everything, well it is hard as heck.  I am convinced that if USO were at the beginning of the year and AO were the last of the majors, that Nole's title count would have been different.   Anyway I am sure he can win another title or 2 here and "rectify" his "poor" record in NY. B-)
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,626
Reactions
14,784
Points
113
9093 said:
Calitennis127 wrote:
<blockquote>
Billie wrote:
Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.
And yet, Broken and Moxie (and Kieran) think that there is nothing questionable about him and Nadal have the same number of US Open titles.</blockquote>
Well, Rafa first made the final in 2010 and Nole did it in 2007. Frankly you can’t exclude number of finals as if that is not a good result. Yes Nole had some tough times at the end of the slam season due to scheduling, weather, it is tough to win it if you play the whole season and go deep in every tournament. Nadal made 2 finals in all of his years as a professional and won them both. He perhaps got a bit lucky and every player needs that. I have no doubt that if Nole had to play 4 days out of the last 5 (like in 2012), or had physical difficulties (like in 2013), or had to play in 100 degree weather like in 2014, this year, he probably wouldn’t have won it past September. People sometimes act as if anybody should win everything, well it is hard as heck. I am convinced that if USO were at the beginning of the year and AO were the last of the majors, that Nole’s title count would have been different. Anyway I am sure he can win another title or 2 here and “rectify” his “poor” record in NY.
wpml_cool.gif

Actually, you forgot that Nadal was in the final at the USO in 2011, when he lost to Nole.  But I wouldn't say he was "lucky" in the USO's he did win.  What can you mean by that?  In 2010 and 2013, he was the best player in that part of the season, no doubt.  He was a bit unlucky that 2008 was an Olympic year, to your point of running out of gas late in a year when you're winning everything.  In fact, that's why many predicted that Rafa would never win the USO.  (I believe that BB recently admitted to that.)  It's actually a bit rich to sing that song for Novak, when he never loses in Beijing, and has won so many YECs.  He's actually often done well in the late part of the season.  You don't really have to excuse Novak's performances at the USO to Cali...he's just mad that Nadal won there twice.  Dispassionately, Novak has only lost in finals there to the other of the big 3.  Denis thinks the worst one was to Murray in 2012.  But Murray was the better player on that day, especially as the better wind player.  I'd argue that the worse one was in the SFs to Nishikori last year, where he'd at least have had a better shot at Cilic and his hot hand, with his ROS, than the burnt out Kei.  In any case, it's worth remembering that having 2 USO's is a very fine thing.  :good:
 

brokenshoelace

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
9,380
Reactions
1,334
Points
113
8709 said:
Broken_shoelace wrote:
<blockquote>
Calitennis127 wrote:
<blockquote>
Billie wrote:
Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.
And yet, Broken and Moxie (and Kieran) think that there is nothing questionable about him and Nadal have the same number of US Open titles.</blockquote>
Glad to see you haven’t gained an ounce of sensibility since our last argument. Just a few days ago, I said Djokovic is a vastly superior hard court player who, on his best day, will beat Nadal’s best on the surface. By saying he’s “vastly” superior, I concede that he should have the results to prove it (and outside of the US Open, he does). What I don’t find questionable, is one particular loss to Nadal in the US Open final in 2013, due to the context at that time. I never said Novak should only have one or two US Open titles, and I never said he should have lost as many finals in New York. In fact, I clearly highlighted his 2012 US Open loss to Murray (just a few days ago, in a post directed at you) as a bad performance that he should be disappointed with. Meaning he should have won. Meaning he should have more US Open titles. Meaning you’re still willfully obtuse just to fabricate narratives. Match results are not measured in context with historical proficiency on a surface, otherwise Nadal should be ashamed to lose to anyone on clay, ever, since his resume on that surface vastly dwarves anyone else’s.</blockquote>
I would agree with this. Of all the final losses 2012 is the most disappointing one. Nadal was on fire that late summer in 2013, he took it (serve was working particularly well). I think 2010 was also a bit questionable due to the schedueling of the semis and the final.

Novak got his day of rest. Final was rained out on Sunday. Also, the semi with Roger in 2010 lasted exactly 3 and a half hours. Not an easy match by any mean but hardly a marathon you wouldn't recover from at that level with a day's rest. Nadal's had straight set victories that almost lasted as long, lol.
 

Billie

Nole fan
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
5,330
Reactions
850
Points
113
Location
Canada
9108 said:
Billie wrote:
<blockquote>
Calitennis127 wrote:
<blockquote>
Billie wrote:
Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.
And yet, Broken and Moxie (and Kieran) think that there is nothing questionable about him and Nadal have the same number of US Open titles.</blockquote>
Well, Rafa first made the final in 2010 and Nole did it in 2007. Frankly you can’t exclude number of finals as if that is not a good result. Yes Nole had some tough times at the end of the slam season due to scheduling, weather, it is tough to win it if you play the whole season and go deep in every tournament. Nadal made 2 finals in all of his years as a professional and won them both. He perhaps got a bit lucky and every player needs that. I have no doubt that if Nole had to play 4 days out of the last 5 (like in 2012), or had physical difficulties (like in 2013), or had to play in 100 degree weather like in 2014, this year, he probably wouldn’t have won it past September. People sometimes act as if anybody should win everything, well it is hard as heck. I am convinced that if USO were at the beginning of the year and AO were the last of the majors, that Nole’s title count would have been different. Anyway I am sure he can win another title or 2 here and “rectify” his “poor” record in NY.
wpml_cool.gif
</blockquote>
Actually, you forgot that Nadal was in the final at the USO in 2011, when he lost to Nole. But I wouldn’t say he was “lucky” in the USO’s he did win. What can you mean by that? In 2010 and 2013, he was the best player in that part of the season, no doubt. He was a bit unlucky that 2008 was an Olympic year, to your point of running out of gas late in a year when you’re winning everything. In fact, that’s why many predicted that Rafa would never win the USO. (I believe that BB recently admitted to that.) It’s actually a bit rich to sing that song for Novak, when he never loses in Beijing, and has won so many YECs. He’s actually often done well in the late part of the season. You don’t really have to excuse Novak’s performances at the USO to Cali…he’s just mad that Nadal won there twice. Dispassionately, Novak has only lost in finals there to the other of the big 3. Denis thinks the worst one was to Murray in 2012. But Murray was the better player on that day, especially as the better wind player. I’d argue that the worse one was in the SFs to Nishikori last year, where he’d at least have had a better shot at Cilic and his hot hand, with his ROS, than the burnt out Kei. In any case, it’s worth remembering that having 2 USO’s is a very fine thing.
wpml_good.gif

I am not excusing anybody or anything, I am just realistic.  I won't get into Cali's and your arguments about how many USOs Nadal should have won or not and the same about Nole.  I am just saying that sometimes you need a bit of luck, the stars to align, perhaps, something that will help you get to fight for the title and still have enough to win it.  Every player needs that!

It funny that I forgot about 2011 but imagine that what happened only 6 days after that to Nole against Delpo in DC semi final happened in that 3rd set in USO final, the winner would have been Rafa again.  But it turned out that Nole was lucky and his shoulder did hold up then and won it.  But he did get injured just a week after that and later he said that he learned from that experience.  He was never that same force for the rest of the season.  Luckily the slam season was over and he was successful in those matches.

In 2012 Nole was the only top guy who played both Toronto and Cincy and made the finals of both, and after the Olympics.  He played his quarter final match on Thursday, then it was the mess of a Saturday semi final where it was so windy and finally the storm came up and washed his match vs Ferrer so they had to resume it on Sunday, where they had to play 3 more sets, only for Nole to come back and play again on Monday in windy conditions against well rested and confident Murray and still the match was taken to a 5th set where finally Nole started to cramp up and just couldn't play anymore.    That match, to my knowledge and by Nole's admission last year in China via Q&A with his fans, is his worst loss in a major.  But sometimes things like that happen and that is what I call being lucky or unlucky.  If that scenario were to be played this past USO, I don't know that Nole would have won.

Frankly last summer (2014) was understandable to me, after winning Wimbledon and his wedding, he just wasn't physically and mentally ready to compete at the highest level.  But if he had a bit of luck and didn't have to play in those hot and humid conditions, maybe he could have sneaked by Nishikori and had a shot at another title.   I mean Cilic steamrolled past Federer, who is a 5 time champion, and was lucky that Federer was spent from his previous match.   When would Cilic win a major if he had to face a full on Federer or Rafa or Nole?  It doesn't mean the eventual winners didn't deserve their wins, it just means they needed a bit of luck to do it.
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,626
Reactions
14,784
Points
113
9162 said:
Moxie wrote:
<blockquote>
Billie wrote:
<blockquote>
Calitennis127 wrote:
<blockquote>
Billie wrote:
Another amazing stat: Remarkably, Djokovic has more titles than losses on hard courts since the beginning of 2011. He was won 29 titles since the beginning of 2011 and lost only 25 times, going 239-25 on the surface during that time.
And yet, Broken and Moxie (and Kieran) think that there is nothing questionable about him and Nadal have the same number of US Open titles.</blockquote>
Well, Rafa first made the final in 2010 and Nole did it in 2007. Frankly you can’t exclude number of finals as if that is not a good result. Yes Nole had some tough times at the end of the slam season due to scheduling, weather, it is tough to win it if you play the whole season and go deep in every tournament. Nadal made 2 finals in all of his years as a professional and won them both. He perhaps got a bit lucky and every player needs that. I have no doubt that if Nole had to play 4 days out of the last 5 (like in 2012), or had physical difficulties (like in 2013), or had to play in 100 degree weather like in 2014, this year, he probably wouldn’t have won it past September. People sometimes act as if anybody should win everything, well it is hard as heck. I am convinced that if USO were at the beginning of the year and AO were the last of the majors, that Nole’s title count would have been different. Anyway I am sure he can win another title or 2 here and “rectify” his “poor” record in NY.
wpml_cool.gif
</blockquote>
Actually, you forgot that Nadal was in the final at the USO in 2011, when he lost to Nole. But I wouldn’t say he was “lucky” in the USO’s he did win. What can you mean by that? In 2010 and 2013, he was the best player in that part of the season, no doubt. He was a bit unlucky that 2008 was an Olympic year, to your point of running out of gas late in a year when you’re winning everything. In fact, that’s why many predicted that Rafa would never win the USO. (I believe that BB recently admitted to that.) It’s actually a bit rich to sing that song for Novak, when he never loses in Beijing, and has won so many YECs. He’s actually often done well in the late part of the season. You don’t really have to excuse Novak’s performances at the USO to Cali…he’s just mad that Nadal won there twice. Dispassionately, Novak has only lost in finals there to the other of the big 3. Denis thinks the worst one was to Murray in 2012. But Murray was the better player on that day, especially as the better wind player. I’d argue that the worse one was in the SFs to Nishikori last year, where he’d at least have had a better shot at Cilic and his hot hand, with his ROS, than the burnt out Kei. In any case, it’s worth remembering that having 2 USO’s is a very fine thing.
wpml_good.gif
</blockquote>
I am not excusing anybody or anything, I am just realistic. I won’t get into Cali’s and your arguments about how many USOs Nadal should have won or not and the same about Nole. I am just saying that sometimes you need a bit of luck, the stars to align, perhaps, something that will help you get to fight for the title and still have enough to win it. Every player needs that! It funny that I forgot about 2011 but imagine that what happened only 6 days after that to Nole against Delpo in DC semi final happened in that 3rd set in USO final, the winner would have been Rafa again. But it turned out that Nole was lucky and his shoulder did hold up then and won it. But he did get injured just a week after that and later he said that he learned from that experience. He was never that same force for the rest of the season. Luckily the slam season was over and he was successful in those matches. In 2012 Nole was the only top guy who played both Toronto and Cincy and made the finals of both, and after the Olympics. He played his quarter final match on Thursday, then it was the mess of a Saturday semi final where it was so windy and finally the storm came up and washed his match vs Ferrer so they had to resume it on Sunday, where they had to play 3 more sets, only for Nole to come back and play again on Monday in windy conditions against well rested and confident Murray and still the match was taken to a 5th set where finally Nole started to cramp up and just couldn’t play anymore. That match, to my knowledge and by Nole’s admission last year in China via Q&A with his fans, is his worst loss in a major. But sometimes things like that happen and that is what I call being lucky or unlucky. If that scenario were to be played this past USO, I don’t know that Nole would have won. Frankly last summer (2014) was understandable to me, after winning Wimbledon and his wedding, he just wasn’t physically and mentally ready to compete at the highest level. But if he had a bit of luck and didn’t have to play in those hot and humid conditions, maybe he could have sneaked by Nishikori and had a shot at another title. I mean Cilic steamrolled past Federer, who is a 5 time champion, and was lucky that Federer was spent from his previous match. When would Cilic win a major if he had to face a full on Federer or Rafa or Nole? It doesn’t mean the eventual winners didn’t deserve their wins, it just means they needed a bit of luck to do it.
Cataloguing where Novak got lucky or unlucky still doesn't change the fact that you said Nadal got a bit lucky to win the USO in 2010 and 2013.  I would dispute this.  OK, yes a bit of luck is involved here and there, but great Champions make their own luck.  They capitalize on opportunity, and they dig out of the rough better than everyone else.  Nadal was the better player in both of those USOs, though, and luck had nothing to do with it, at least in the finals.

I would also dispute what you say about the 2012 UOS SF/Final.  When Novak came back to play Ferrer on the Sunday, he had no real trouble taking him apart, on a lovely dry day, so I don't think that spoiled his chances on the Monday, with more than 24 hours to recover.  And the cramping didn't come in until very late in the fifth, when Djokovic was already in trouble.  Murray was the better player on that day, up two sets to love, and playing the wind better.  Novak did a very brave job to take it to a 5th, but he caused his own troubles by not playing better in the first two sets.  Another way of looking at is it that, if the USO had chosen to play the two SFs simultaneously, during the crazy wind and before the storm, Ferrer's spin might have taken Novak out before the final.  So there's an argument that he was lucky to be in the final, at all.

As to 2014, I don't really buy that Djokovic was not emotionally prepared for the USO because he'd won Wimbledon, and he'd gotten married in the interim.  He'd won Wimbledon before, and he'd been living with his now-wife for many years.  You have a party, you get a week to recover from it, and then you carry on as usual.  The heat and humidity were the same for all players, and Nishikori, who is judged by many to be perhaps too small and frail to win a Major, had also had the most brutal path of all the semi-finalists, playing several 5-setters, and tying the record for the latest.  Look, Nishikori played great, I think we can all agree on that.  But I don't buy the excuses why Nole didn't do better.

The stars may align for people like Cilic, and Gaudio, and even Wawrinka.  For greats like Federer, Nadal and Djokovic, they have often aligned the stars to suit their purposes.  When they miss an opportunity, it is usually in some part their fault.