Tennis Generations, Part Two: Before the Open Era

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,333
Reactions
6,103
Points
113
OK, I'm finally back on the horse with this series. Here's Part Two.

In case anyone is wondering, here is what I have planned:

1. Open Era Generations - Introduction
2. Before the Open Era
3. Gen 1: Dominance from Down Under (1934-38)
4. Gen 2: Ashe and Who? (1939-43)
5. Gen 3: A New Era (1944-48)
6. Gen 4: Connors & Crew (1949-53)
7. Gen 5: First and Greatest of the Swedes (1954-58)
8. Gen 6: Johnny & Ivan (1959-63)
9. Gen 7: Matty, Stefan, and Boris (1964-68)
10. Gen 8: American Greatness (1969-73)
11. Gen 9: Inbetweeners (1974-78)
12. Gen 10: Generation Federer (1979-83)
13. Gen 11: Rafa & Novak (1984-88)
14. Gen 12: The Donald Young Guns, aka the Lost Generation (1989-93)
15. Gen 13: A New Hope? (1994-98)

All titles are tentative. Anyhow, my hope is to average one per week to take us through the quieter fall season.
 

Great Hands

Pro Tour Player
Joined
Feb 14, 2015
Messages
238
Reactions
1
Points
0
Really enjoyed reading that, El Dude! A really good overview - nice to see you big up Pancho - as you say, he is often forgotten when people talk about all-time greats. I look forward to the next instalment!
 

Riotbeard

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
4,810
Reactions
12
Points
38
Great work El Dude. It was a really interesting read. Looking forward to the next one when you can get into a bit more detail!
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,333
Reactions
6,103
Points
113
Thanks, folks.
b
Riotbeard said:
Great work El Dude. It was a really interesting read. Looking forward to the next one when you can get into a bit more detail!

Yeah, I hear that. I almost didn't write this one, and just start off with the 1934-38 generation, but it felt wrong not to acknowledge the older greats.

Some generations are going to be more in-depth than others, because some are just so much better (and more interesting). For instance, the first one is probably the greatest of all time and the second one of the worst.

I will probably put more detail into the more recent generations, because there's just more info out there.
 

Riotbeard

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
4,810
Reactions
12
Points
38
El Dude said:
Thanks, folks.
b
Riotbeard said:
Great work El Dude. It was a really interesting read. Looking forward to the next one when you can get into a bit more detail!

Yeah, I hear that. I almost didn't write this one, and just start off with the 1934-38 generation, but it felt wrong not to acknowledge the older greats.

Some generations are going to be more in-depth than others, because some are just so much better (and more interesting). For instance, the first one is probably the greatest of all time and the second one of the worst.

I will probably put more detail into the more recent generations, because there's just more info out there.

No, I think it was interesting, and worth doing. It made me want to do a little history in nineteenth century newspapers about some of these figures when I have a little bit of time.
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,333
Reactions
6,103
Points
113
Riotbeard said:
No, I think it was interesting, and worth doing. It made me want to do a little history in nineteenth century newspapers about some of these figures when I have a little bit of time.

That would be great!