Should the WTA copy the ATP masters series?

jhar26

Pro Tour Champion
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
435
Reactions
1
Points
16
And I mostly mean how they are called. The ATP has the masters 1000's, masters 500's and masters 250's. That's simple and everyone knows what it means because it's obvious that a masters 1000 is a bigger event than a masters 500 which is a bigger event than a masters 250.

The WTA has premier mandatory events, premier5's, premiers and internationals. I challenge any casual fan to explain the ranking order of events with names like that. I would propose that all premier mandatorys and premier5's would be masters 1000's - the difference between the two is almost negligible anyway. Premiers would become masters 500's and internationals masters 250's.
 

Sundaymorningguy

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
6,384
Reactions
1,759
Points
113
Location
Norfolk, VA
I would also give an extra hundred points for defending a title. I think it a bit ridiculous on both sides that anyone defending his/her title gets no points for defending. I would also give an extra 25 points for anyone who participates in Davis/Fed Cup.