Roger Federer's late run of misfortune

T

tenniskiosk

Roger Federer has been touted to be the greatest player to have ever competed in the game of tennis, with 17 grand slam titles to his name and a total of 302 weeks as the world number one. Without a doubt, he is the greatest player to have ever played the game of tennis. Despite the accolades he has, the 2013 season has been a far cry from what we have come to expect from the great Roger Federer. As a fan of his, it has really been disheartening to know of his recent streak of misfortune, and I wish that he would find the form that brought him 17 grand slam titles before.

When Roger lost in the second round of Wimbledon, I was shocked. I never knew that the defending champion of Wimbledon would fall out so quickly. Moreover, it is Wimbledon, the tournament where Roger marked the beginning of his decade of dominance. I always believed that Roger Federer is in a class of his own, and I never expected him to be enduring the worst season he has in the last 10 years.

The game of tennis has evolved so much from where it started. It has become more physically taxing then what it was in the past. What we see on TV doesn’t do the sport of tennis justice as they are running so much faster and hitting the ball so much harder in reality. Believe me it is much tougher than what we think. At the ripe age of 32, it may be a little tough to keep up with the punishing toll the modern game takes on the human body. Well, maybe he has another grand slam left in him, and I would not like to diminish that fact. But if this is to become a reality, it has to be within the next year or two, as time is finite for him.

Roger Federer’s latest result at the Shanghai Rolex Masters 2013 has been a huge blow to the hopes of him regaining the form we once expected, and it has left fans wondering whether the best has yet to come for him. Could it be time for him to hang up his rackets? Or should he retire on a high by winning another grand slam, just like what Pete Sampras did. I would certainly hope for the latter and that Roger Federer will go down in the history books as a great legend.

find me at
http://tenniskiosk.com/
 

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
27,424
Reactions
6,247
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
Father time can be cruel, although I think in Fed's case he's also been dealing with nagging injuries and low confidence. I think he's got a little more to squeeze out of the tank, but I guess we'll see for sure next year.
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,163
Reactions
5,848
Points
113
I disagree that Roger is "without a doubt...the greatest player to have ever played the game of tennis."

I think there are doubts and I can think of two: "Rafael" and "Nadal."
 

JesuslookslikeBorg

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
6,323
Reactions
1,074
Points
113
El Dude said:
I disagree that Roger is "without a doubt...the greatest player to have ever played the game of tennis."

I think there are doubts and I can think of two: "Rafael" and "Nadal."

why is that 2 doubts :snigger

are "Rafael" and "nadal" separate people now ?, the vamos twins.
 
T

tenniskiosk

El Dude said:
I disagree that Roger is "without a doubt...the greatest player to have ever played the game of tennis."

I think there are doubts and I can think of two: "Rafael" and "Nadal."

roger's career is not over and he still has time to add to the numbers, and thus he is still in the running for the greatest player
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,036
Reactions
7,325
Points
113
Well, he was the greatest player between 2003 and 2007, if that helps.

Speaking of time, old Father Time has stroked his silver beard on Roger. There's very little of that is his fault...
 

isabelle

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
4,673
Reactions
634
Points
113
El Dude said:
I disagree that Roger is "without a doubt...the greatest player to have ever played the game of tennis."

I think there are doubts and I can think of two: "Rafael" and "Nadal."

What about Laver and his 2 GS ??? I guess he can be considerer like the nest till today
 

DarthFed

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,724
Reactions
3,477
Points
113
No misfortune this year. Skill wise he is not yet a scrub but he has played like one all year. His fault and his alone. We will see what he brings in 2014 but I doubt it will be worse. If it is, then it's time to go.
 
N

NADAL2005RG

I wonder who will get the Double Career Grand Slam first, Nadal or Federer. If one of these guys finishes with the Double Career Grand Slam AND the Total Slam Record.....its all over.
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,163
Reactions
5,848
Points
113
tenniskiosk said:
El Dude said:
I disagree that Roger is "without a doubt...the greatest player to have ever played the game of tennis."

I think there are doubts and I can think of two: "Rafael" and "Nadal."

roger's career is not over and he still has time to add to the numbers, and thus he is still in the running for the greatest player

Neither is Nadal's and he's (presumably) got more peak years to add to his numbers. Remember, when comparing Federer to Nadal you have to look at Federer's career through Nadal's current age (27), which is Roger in 2008 when he, also, had 13 Slams.

isabelle, I've talked too much about the GOAT, but I see five main candidates, in chronological order: Pancho Gonzales, Ken Rosewall, Rod Laver, Roger Federer, and Rafael Nadal. I think Bill Tilden, Pete Sampras, and Bjorn Borg are also worthy of at least considering, but for various reasons miss the cut. The other five all have legitimate arguments. I agree with tenniskiosk that Roger holds the title of GOAT at the moment, but that Rafa has at least a solid chance of surpassing him before he's through.

That said, I'd love to see Roger win one more to get to 18. A few years ago that was my prediction. But unless he discovers the fountain of youth, or at least the "elixir of confidence," I think he's stuck on 17 and his legacy won't be added to significantly. So in my mind the question is whether can stay healthy long enough before he starts showing serious signs of aging to get the records he needs to surpass Roger.
 
N

NADAL2005RG

Kieran said:
Well, he was the greatest player between 2003 and 2007, if that helps.

Speaking of time, old Father Time has stroked his silver beard on Roger. There's very little of that is his fault...

Yep Federer finished the year ranked #1 in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009.

I agree, Federer couldn't do anything to stop this decline. He's always had the ambition (perhaps more than anyone) and dedication. He's maxed out his ability.
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,697
Reactions
14,873
Points
113
DarthFed said:
No misfortune this year. Skill wise he is not yet a scrub but he has played like one all year. His fault and his alone. We will see what he brings in 2014 but I doubt it will be worse. If it is, then it's time to go.

I agree that he can regroup in 2014, and who's to say he won't have another good year? By all accounts, he still enjoys the game.
 
N

NADAL2005RG

Hopefully Tsonga can regroup next year too, and Berdych. Those guys need slam titles far more than the big 3 need them, especially Federer (the most fortunate player in history, in terms of slam titles).
 

Front242

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
22,992
Reactions
3,923
Points
113
NADAL2005RG said:
Hopefully Tsonga can regroup next year too, and Berdych. Those guys need slam titles far more than the big 3 need them, especially Federer (the most fortunate player in history, in terms of slam titles).

You think he won them all just by good fortune. That's a good one. Who donated them to him may I ask? You play the guy across the net. You beat him in the final, you win the slam. Fortunately for him he's so good he won 17. So yeah, I guess he's fortunate to have been born with great tennis skills so I take it back, you're dead right.
 

DarthFed

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,724
Reactions
3,477
Points
113
NADAL2005RG said:
Kieran said:
Well, he was the greatest player between 2003 and 2007, if that helps.

Speaking of time, old Father Time has stroked his silver beard on Roger. There's very little of that is his fault...

Yep Federer finished the year ranked #1 in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009.

I agree, Federer couldn't do anything to stop this decline. He's always had the ambition (perhaps more than anyone) and dedication. He's maxed out his ability.

We'll agree to disagree about Federer maxing out his ability. When all is said and done I can't think of any other player who has had so many near misses late in slams and oftentimes from winning positions. Roger's one weakness is that he didn't perform well in crunch time of matches (5th sets). 3-7 in 5 set matches in GS semis and finals. Way too many slams on the table and the lefty from Mallorca may yet make him pay.
 
N

NADAL2005RG

Front242 said:
NADAL2005RG said:
Hopefully Tsonga can regroup next year too, and Berdych. Those guys need slam titles far more than the big 3 need them, especially Federer (the most fortunate player in history, in terms of slam titles).

You think he won them all just by good fortune. That's a good one. Who donated them to him may I ask? You play the guy across the net. You beat him in the final, you win the slam. Fortunately for him he's so good he won 17. So yeah, I guess he's fortunate to have been born with great tennis skills so I take it back, you're dead right.

I used the word fortune to represent grand slam titles (not luck), as I think the thread titled was using the word misfortune to represent a lack of grand slam titles (described as a "late run of misfortune").