OBAMA adminstrtn the Faithful ACCOMPLICE of ISIL..

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
of course such things to say are not allowed in the ''properly vetted" USA ''news"...
=============================

journal-neo.org
Obama Administration – the Faithful Accomplice of ISIS | New Eastern Outlook
Author: Jean Perier
It’s clear that at this stage even those readers who haven’t been following the recent geopolitical events closely start asking the question: why, despite the billions of dollars allocated on the so-called “War on Terror” no visible result has been reached so far by the Western allies in the fight against ISIS? Where do all these funds go and haven’t they been used by the US political and military establishment for the sake personal gain, instead of putting in place a comprehensive mechanism to fight the terror?

Both the Spanish Publico and the American Financial Times note that, in spite of Washington’s official rhetoric about the fight against terrorism, radical militants continue receiving new weapons, money and supplies, which has already resulted in a considerable boost in their morale that allowed ISIS to launch a counter-offensive. Weapons and funds keep flowing from states like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which incriminates the United States big time. The Pentagon and the CIA in recent years have sent truckloads of weapons to Syria, while saying that they were designated to the members of the so-called “moderate opposition”, yet time and time again those weapons end up in the hands of radical militants, affiliated with the Al-Nusra Front, Al-Qaeda and ISIS. And Washington has been fully aware of this fact, Western observers say.

At the beginning of this year, journalists of the French Le Monde published the results of their own investigation of the US inaction in Syria, which allegedly remains one of the main fronts of Western fight against ISIS. They, in particular, say that sources in the so-called “Syrian opposition” say that back in 2014 Americans were warned about the rapid rise of ISIS and the Al-Nusra Front, however Washington was in no hurry to act. Therefore, it is not surprising that various media source across the globe say that the US created “perfect preconditions” for the rise and consequent strengthening of those fanatical and bloodthirsty jihadi movements in the Middle East that slaughtered thousands of civilians.

The prominent alternative media site CounterPunch would note:

The Obama Administration was fully aware of the consequences of its actions in Syria but it kept pursuing the policy of funding, training, arming and internationally legitimizing the so-called “Syrian Opposition”. A small fraction of it was comprised of defected Syrian soldiers, which goes by the name of free Syria army, but a vast majority has been Sunni jihadists who were generously funded, trained and armed by the alliance of Western powers , Turkey, Jordan and the Gulf States.

Further still, Republican Michael McCaul, the chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, accused the US administration of the failed policies in the Middle East policy. In an interview with ABC he underlined the fact that the architect of this foreign policy, Hillary Clinton, was responsible for the rise and formation of ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

Speaking for the Fox News, the former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani announced that the former secretary of state is responsible for the rise of ISIS. Moreover, he underlined that Hillary Clinton could be considered a founding member of ISIS, since Clinton was part of the Obama administration when she forced the Shiites to make a choice by not intervening in Syria at the proper time.

The fact that the cancer of terrorism keeps spreading due to the Obama administration actions has been noted by The Washington Post:

If he had attacked the Islamic State cancer early, Obama could have stopped it from spreading in the first place. He did nothing, while the cancer grew in Syria and then spread in Iraq.

Now the cancer has spread and metastasized across the world. According to a recent CNN analysis, since declaring its caliphate in 2014, the Islamic State has carried out 90 attacks in 21 countries outside of Iraq and Syria that have killed 1,390 people and injured more than 2,000 others. The Islamic State has a presence in more than a dozen countries.

Al-Qaeda has also regained lost ground in Yemen, the Syrian al Qaeda affiliate Jabhat al Nusra poses one of the most significant long-term threats of any Salafi-jihadi group and is much more dangerous than the ISIS model in the long run. Overall, Gen. Jack Keane recently testified that al-Qaeda has “grown fourfold in the last five years.”

So it looks like an appropriate time to demand the Obama administration to confess where did the billions allocated on the so-called “War on Terror” went?

Jean Périer is an independent researcher and analyst and a renowned expert on the Near and Middle East, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”

45
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
american leaders and obama of course keep insisting to this day - even when GLOBALLY EXPOSED as the weapons suppliers and ''trainers" for decades of TERRORISTS as tools for 'regime change' over governments that are not OBEDIENT to ''Good guys" america --

that these terrorists by many names are ''moderate rebels" ...
and keep insisting that RUSSIA - must not 'bomb certain areas with *moderate rebels*"

who promptly give their US supplied weapons to their brother terrorists or simply switch ''banner" doing the same thing...

because of what really? lol.

as the russians said since when they began BEATING UP the TERRORISTS financed by AMERICA'S ''friends" - and weaponized by america THROUGH its ''friends" --

"what moderate rebels? where are they? why don't they come to the discussion table and present themselves so things can be worked out as they themselves insist?

''it is quite interesting that since our partners from the west started bombing what they called Daesh, ISIL in syria that were never there before LIBYA and IRAQ were destroyed by their own policies..based on lies...somehow where-ever americans bombed in syria -- the terrorists grew in numbers and power...straight to damascus and what was once syria's greatest and most prosperous city of Aleppo...

''it is interesting that our satellite images show that much of where our partners bomb are nothing but empty desert...while highways are created for the terrorists to move quite safely with their oil smuggling of IRAQ'S AND SYRIA'S OIL...

"and now they ask us not to bomb certain areas because they say there are *moderate rebels?".

"it is interesting that everytime we accommodate our western partners for a ceasefire -- the terrorists GROW back in numbers...do our partners really thing we are that stupid?''

''we strictly provide our western partners the necessary sortie operations to destroy the terrorists so that there will be no misunderstandings...
"our requests for comparable operations from them to destroy terrorists as they say they want to do -- we get no responses..what are they doing in syria then? which no international laws or syrian sovereign laws have given them permission to be in syria at all? are our partners SERIOUS about defeating terrorists or not? ''

"if they talk and move and kill like terrorists -- they are terrorists - and we are going to bomb them".

END OF STORY.

lol.
 
Last edited:

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,697
Reactions
14,873
Points
113
It is difficult to take seriously any "journalist" who would write this sentence: "So it looks like an appropriate time to demand the Obama administration to confess where did the billions allocated on the so-called “War on Terror” went?" Your source is essentially a blog, and that many grammatical mistakes in one sentence do make me question the rest of the information.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
It is difficult to take seriously any "journalist" who would write this sentence: "So it looks like an appropriate time to demand the Obama administration to confess where did the billions allocated on the so-called “War on Terror” went?" Your source is essentially a blog, and that many grammatical mistakes in one sentence do make me question the rest of the information.

it is even harder -- actually IMPOSSIBLE

TO TAKE even half seriously someone who -- because they can dismiss something as a 'BLOG' will ignore the facts when they are VERY , VERY embarrassing.

and tehn talk about grammar.

ehj --- that SHOULD mean

BAD GRAMMAR LIKE THIS -- A LOGICAL FLAW in and of itself that ought NEVER to be used in any proper language...

"WE are a pacific nation -- THEREFORE we are also an ASIAN nation..and we INTEND to CONTINUE to be the asian LEADER:"

extremely bad, bad grammar - completely FAULTY logic ...and outright mendacity in the use of language - exactly as GEORGE ORWELL depicted in his ESSAY

"ENGLISH AND THE CORRUPTION OF LANGUAGE" - KNOWN as orwellian ''truthiness"

which -- the above example came from the MOUTH OF THE GREAT ORATOR -- EMPEROR BARACK OBAMA of the USA.

which had to be CORRECTED by the CHINESE IN editorial responses>

"WE have taken note of recent statements by President Obama of the USA...we disagree:
"america may be a pacific nation -- but that does NOT mean it is ALSO and ASIAN nation...and has NO business insisting it is the asian LEADER".


that wasn't a BLOG - DEAR -- that was CORRECTION by the country that OWNS 3 trillion dollars of american debt...

u know -- an actual ASIAN pacific country AND the MIDDLE KINGDOM of ASIA since, uh -- 6,000 years ago?

to whom YOUR obama aint' worth snot!

lol.
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,697
Reactions
14,873
Points
113
Put a little more tinfoil in the hat...that should take care of it.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Put a little more tinfoil in the hat...that should take care of it.


OBAMA:
"putin is like that fat boy at the back of the class..u know, slouching and chewing a bubble gum - and doesn't do too well in class..and doesn't have any friends".

PUTIN: "since i am asked what it is like dealing with President Obama...well....

"it is like playing chess -- with a Pigeon....
first it knocks down the pieces...
then it defecates on the board...
then it struts around as if it just won the game".