Novak fans are a disgrace

[El Dude]

Just for the sake of symmetry.

 

[Jelenafan]

Let’s throw in Agassi fans too.

 

[Denis]

Just for the sake of symmetry.

Lol

 

[mrzz]

If @El Dude created this thread it is surely because he has some statistical data backing it up!

 

[Horsa]

Well, knowing him I'd agree. Come on out with it, El Dude we'd love to see it.

If @El Dude created this thread it is surely because he has some statistical data backing it up!

 

[Andy22]

Djokovic has 10/15 slams on hard court's so basically just a hard court player, federer definitely still ahead of him so is nadal.

 

[Andy22]

Yes djokovic fans are really bad thinking he's goat, then his beaten that old guy federer and a player who gets injured every season nadal. Djokovic wins on easy courts (fast hard) and is not ahead on anything federer won more Wimbledon's and us opens as well Nadal's won more French opens.

 

[mrzz]

I was thinking, hards and grass are really too easy. More than half of the players that enter the tournaments on those surface end up winning it. Historical average says that on hards if a player enters a tournament, he has a 56,47% chance of winning it. On grass the average is even higher, at 67,8%. Back in the old days it was still worst, players playing on grass had more than 75% of chance of being champion. That's why major tournaments started to be played by 128 players only, they used to be played by 256, but in the 1957 Wimbledon a whooping number of 255 players won that tournament, and organizers could not produce enough trophies. Chances are, if they had not slowed down the surfaces, that even with 128 players entering majors we would have more than 200 different winners at each edition.