Murrays fans are a disgrace

[The_Grand_Slam]

Its big 3 not big 4

 

[nehmeth]

Funny thing, most of the Murray fans (that I knew) were pretty stellar folk. I liked all of them. I just didn’t like Murray.

 

[Denis]

Funny thing, most of the Murray fans (that I knew) were pretty stellar folk. I liked all of them. I just didn’t like Murray.

Off court I think he’s a good guy. On court he’s terrible.

 

[AnonymousFan]

He’ll be missed once he’s officially retired!

 

[GameSetAndMath]

In a room, there is an apple. Four people, Tin Tin, Calculus, a Murray Fan and a Fed fan are trying to grab it.

Who will succeed?






















Of course the Fed fan as the rest are fictional characters.

 

[Horsa]

Funny thing, most of the Murray fans (that I knew) were pretty stellar folk. I liked all of them. I just didn’t like Murray.

I'm a Murray fan. The reasons for that are as follows:

1. I'm a patriotic Brit & he gave Brits hope of winning after our dismal performances by winning Wimbledon & the Olympics.
2. After what happened in Dunblane in the '90s he brought good to the town so when people thought about Dunblane it wasn't always about the bad news. It gave the residents something to be proud of.

 

[Horsa]

In a room, there is an apple. Four people, Tin Tin, Calculus, a Murray Fan and a Fed fan are trying to grab it.

Who will succeed?






















Of course the Fed fan as the rest are fictional characters.

I will take that in the spirit it's meant in & laugh with you but disagree.

 

[Horsa]

Please can we get out of the habit of categorising everyone over 1 lot of likes & judging everyone who likes 1 person as the same? They're not. Different people have all different likes & are different. I'll give a few examples. Example No. 1. I'm a big fan of equestrian sports because I love horses so take every chance of seeing them & know quite a bit about equine anatomy, art & history. Does that mean that all equestrian sports fans know about equine anatomy, art & history? No. Example No. 2. Each person is not just a fan of 1 thing or person but many & have many hobbies & interests. For example, I'm a Murray fan but I'm also a big Bronte fan, I'm an equestrian sports fan as I mentioned, I'm a George Stubbs fan, I'm interested in antiques & archaeology, I'm a Wedgwood collector & there are many other things I'm a fan of, I'm interested in & that I collect & I'm a fan of more than just equine art as I like other art too like the works of Leonardo, Landseer & Constable.

 

[Ricardo]

Is there such a Thing called a Murray fan? I mean unless one is trying to learn how to whine

 

[CandyGirl]

Funny thing, most of the Murray fans (that I knew) were pretty stellar folk. I liked all of them. I just didn’t like Murray.

I'm not a Murray fan either. Much prefer Tim Henman.

 

[Fiero425]

It's Big 3 not the Big 4.

Traditionally it's always been like that; "the BIG 4" going back to the beginning of the Open Era! Even if it meant bringing a scrub on deck to even the count; a symbolic SF draw could be imagined! In my day it was all about Connors, Borg, McEnroe, with a qualifying 4th wheel! Vitas Gerulaitis was elevated even though owned by the Big 3 at the time! His record was dismal against all the top players; never beating Borg, and not much else off the others! Gerulaitis was a nice, solid player for the most part with his only real weapon his court speed and being buds with the others! Vilas was a lot more gifted with weapons testing the others sometimes, but couldn't sustain it for various reasons! Later the top 4 seemed to come from the US with Sampras, Agassi, Courier, & Chang, but was usually broken up with Edberg, Becker, Rafter, Kafelnikov, etc.! Murray's probably done more as a 4th WHEEL even though I can't stand the guy! He won his share of Masters & a few majors, ascended to #1 for a brief few minutes, and had some success against the Top 3! He's probably been the best to just make the so called "Big 4," getting more out of it than past players in his position! :whistle: