Harvard education activist admits (implicitly) to Northern Democratic hypocrisy.....

calitennis127

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
4,947
Reactions
459
Points
83
Before I jump into the meat of this interview - just a little background for our non-American friends on the board, such as Britbox.

When it comes to issues relating to the poor in the United States, what is considerably different than in other Western countries is the racially obsessed political dimension attached to it. On that note, there are certain "landmark" moments in American history celebrated by the education system and the dominant media that supposedly show "how far we have come". (The phrase "how far we have come" has to be one of the most stupidly used expressions in the entire world, as the videos below demonstrate.) But the particular "landmark moment" in question here is the U.S. Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision of 1954 (one which the excellent black writer Zora Neale Hurston took great issue with). In popular mythology (mythology I was taught in school and once believed), this decision "ended racial segregation in America" and paved the way for a brighter future. Furthermore - for our non-American friends - the Brown v. Board decision is presented as the appropriate response to an 1896 decision of the Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson, which maintained that public schools could be racially separate so long as they were equal. Brown v. Board came along and decreed that, no, racially segregated schools were inherently unequal and were therefore no longer permissible.

Well, so does the story stop there? Is the United States now a splendid post-racial utopia with a half-white president now because of "landmark moments" such as Brown v. Board? Many white leftists - whose denial of basic realities is utterly astonishing - contend that it is. Unfortunately, they have no idea what they are talking about.

Which brings us to this wonderful interview with Jonathan Kozol. Mr. Kozol graduated from Harvard with a degree in English literature. He was once very active in the original Civil Rights Movement. He is a leftist who believes in ever more government funding to solve society's problems. Most of all, he is known as an education activist on behalf of inner-city schools and minority children in America.

Now, I happen to disagree with Kozol politically, but I do have immense respect for the work he has done and the fact that, before spouting off about racism in America, he has actually gone into the rougher areas and spent time looking at reality. He also has a clear love of children and educating the young. This is all to be commended. Anyone who respects hard work and candor should respect Jonathan Kozol. He has spent many honest hours in the trenches.

But why am I bringing this up? Among other reasons, Britbox asked me to "provide solutions" instead of just assigning blame. Well, I would contend that accurately assigning blame is necessary to "providing solutions". In the United States, denial of basic reality is the norm and gains one prestige and acceptability. If you lie about bad situations and make people feel good, then you are considered progressive. If you tell it like it is, people are turned off. Such is the case with this matter.

The significance of this interview is that Kozol admits (implicitly) that white leftist-Democrats of the Northeast are reality-denying hypocrites of the highest magnitude. Their perceptions are a mixture of silliness, wishful thinking, and outright dishonesty. This starts with their bashing of the South as a backwater - among other things, they allege that the South (going back to the completely misrepresented and misunderstood "Civil War") is much more "racist" than the North.

Well, take a look at what Kozol has to say about that. He pretty much says that this notion is a load of hogwash, right off the bat. Here are some of the gems (these quotes are not always exactly verbatim, but close enough):

- "Racial segregation has come back with a vengeance in America's schools"
- "The most segregated state for minority children in America today is not in the South, it's New York"; after New York, the most segregated states education-wise are Illinois (because of Chicago), Michigan (because of Detroit), and California (because of Los Angeles); Kozol also states that Washington, D.C. would be included with those 4 if it was a state
- "Inner-city schools in America today are as segregated as schools in Mississippi in 1925"
- "In the neighborhood I know best, the South Bronx of New York, there are 11,000 elementary school children, and only 26 are white"
- "At a 5,000-student high school in Los Angeles, I did not see one white kid"
- "Inner-city schools exhibit a panorama of total racial isolation"
- "Only two-tenths of one percent separate the legal apartheid of the South 50 years ago and the reality in Northern inner-city schools today"
- "America today suffers from apartheid schooling"

And then, to the point about the Brown decision, Kozol says:

- "We have ripped the guts out of the Brown decision"
- "We haven't even lived up to the tarnished promise of Plessy v. Ferguson, an 1896 decision that said at least if schools are separate they would be equal"


So everyone - let's get this clear. I can't stress enough to our non-American friends that the degree of Southern-bashing in the North, especially among Democrats, is constant and ruthless. Being a native Northerner myself who has been around university people constantly, I have heard it non-stop. The South is racist, the South is too religious, the South is dumb, the South is why we still have guns, the South has held back progress in this country, blah blah blah blah. And here we have a Harvard leftist who has researched schooling in America his entire professional career pointing out that the most segregated state in the United States for minority children is NEW YORK - Hillary Clinton's state. Following New York are Illinois (Obama's state), Michigan (Detroit being the poster-city of the Great Society and social welfare programs), California (being the supposedly enlightened Hollywood state), and Washington, D.C. (home of our non-racist politicians).

These realities illustrate the dark and depressing hypocrisy of politics in America today. White leftists are all about helping out minorities in their official political pronouncements - until they have to decide where they are sending their kids to school. It certainly won't be to any elementary schools in the South Bronx; we know that. They will just say what makes them feel good about THEMSELVES and WITHIN THEMSELVES, without actually addressing reality in any sort of meaningful or positive fashion.

This interview was from 2006 - 50 years after the Brown decision. And Kozol said in it, basically, that we have gotten nowhere.

[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UR6yFsGMrqc[/video]

[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxjmehzWR9w[/video]

[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dQe983ypvk[/video]
 

calitennis127

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
4,947
Reactions
459
Points
83
This post I made is all the more relevant in light of the Donald Sterling controversy.
 

Murat Baslamisli

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,337
Reactions
1,055
Points
113
Age
52
Location
Aurora, Ontario, Canada
Website
www.drummershangout.ca
I am confused about one thing Cali: Here in Toronto (maybe in all of Canada but I am not sure about all the provinces), if you go to public school, you go to the school that your neighborhood is assigned to. In other words, you cannot just go to any school of your choice, at the other end of town, unless it is private. Is there such a system in the US? If so, would that explain the segregation as you put it, meaning, these schools are in predominantly black neighborhoods, so they are predominantly black? Just asking...
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,011
Reactions
7,287
Points
113
Interesting stuff, Cali, thanks for posting it...
 

calitennis127

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
4,947
Reactions
459
Points
83
1972Murat said:
I am confused about one thing Cali: Here in Toronto (maybe in all of Canada but I am not sure about all the provinces), if you go to public school, you go to the school that your neighborhood is assigned to. In other words, you cannot just go to any school of your choice, at the other end of town, unless it is private. Is there such a system in the US? If so, would that explain the segregation as you put it, meaning, these schools are in predominantly black neighborhoods, so they are predominantly black? Just asking...

Murat, that is a good question and I am no expert on educational administrative districts. However, from the sound of it our assigning of school districts in the U.S. is pretty similar to Canada and it indicates the same trend: students go to local schools. And if students are going to local schools, and if their schools are highly segregated, then it follows that there is de facto segregation.

The broader point that I am making has to do with the hypocritical happy talk about race in America that comes from certain quarters. Yes, there are a number of red-state rednecks who don't want much to do with black people, but many of the worst and most despicable offenders with regard to race in "Umerika" - land of the liars, and home of the deluded - are white leftist Democrats who consider themselves the most progressive and most enlightened on the subject.

Yes, when Donald Sterling runs his mouth on black people in a private conversation that is released to TMZ (illegally), these leftist adolescents all stand up and scream bloody murder. They write op-eds, fill up blogs, tweet more than a tweety bird, show outrage, and wring those hands out sanctimoniously, but when they have to make serious life decisions like where they will send their kids to school or where they will live or what they will do on the weekend, they stay as far away from black people as possible. But because they are so consumed by white guilt as well as contempt for Christianity, and because they have been so brainwashed by the Frankfurt School psychological conditioning of the last 70 years, they have this internal reflexive need to shout and pant like children who didn't get what they want for Christmas at the slightest hint of "racism".

Let me put this way: for the hypocritical and deluded white leftist Democrats, anti-racism and anti-Christianity is a full-on religion. They are fanatical, obsessive, combative, passionate, zealous, and consumed by fury. They can't find enough Phil Robertsons or Donald Sterlings to demonize, because the silly media frenzies that occur around their "controversial remarks" feed the energy needed for the campaigns they care most about, and they also serve to distract the public from the sordid mess the Democrats and their Republican accomplices have made of so many black communities in America today.

It's easy to be one of the lemmings going off the cliff of abject stupidity condemning Donald Sterling from your keyboard - as if Sterling's comments seriously impacted a single human being on the planet (which they didn't). It's quite another to actually be genuine in relating to black people, having black friends, and helping out the struggling African-American communities. No leftist Democrat does this. All they can do is prate about "institutional racism" and fight for abortion rights and then brag about how they get the black vote every four years because they are so progressive and with-the-program.

The amount of contradictions one can bring to light when it comes to the left and race are almost countless. Among them is the way that they give honorary status to the NAACP, which was just about to give DONALD STERLING A LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD. And then it is hilarious to see so many on the left saying things like "this didn't just start two weeks ago, Sterling has a track record of racism". Well then, geniuses, how did your precious NAACP get it so wrong? Care to condemn them for being overzealous propagandists who do false "work"?

I doubt it.
 

Murat Baslamisli

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,337
Reactions
1,055
Points
113
Age
52
Location
Aurora, Ontario, Canada
Website
www.drummershangout.ca
I agree with some of your points Cali. There is a huge amount of hypocrisy and dishonesty going on when it comes to race relations in North America.

Where I work, everyone is from somewhere...I mean, this is Canada, country of immigrants. I asked couple of my black buddies the other day this question: Would you rather associate with a person that says all the right things to you but secretly is a racist and hates you versus a guy who openly says that he does not like your kind and since you know how he feels, you now know not to associate with the guy at all. They both said they'd rather know so they would just not have any relationship with the guy.

We have a lot of fake relationships here under the name of "tolerance" and "acceptance". People are forced to behave and think a certain way. As an individualist , I am not comfortable with that. But also as an individualist, I know racism is the worst kind of collectivism ever. In my belief system, there are no black people. There are black individuals, just like white individuals. I do not like some, love others...

The issue I struggle with is , how do you let individuals express their opinions, racist or bigoted, and STILL manage to have a civilized conversation. Because right now, we have closed the conversation, we have don't ask , don't tell, and we have a lot of closet racists and bigots and homophobes. It looks calm on the surface but underneath, lots of issues are simmering. It is dangerous, and it is dishonest. It BREEDS dishonesty. Can societies thrive based on dishonesty?

I am not offended easily. As Salman Rushdie once said, not being offended is not a right. Everyone is offended by one thing or the other these days. Very soon, people will not be able to talk because it will offend people who are unable to talk! I know, I am exaggerating, but it is not far off. You cannot even wave your hand at someone because what if they don't have an arm? They will think you are showing off! Ok, I am still pushing it but I truly feel that way. I believe society should lighten up. Enough with the political correctness and euphemisms to make people feel better. I am a SALESMAN, not a team member, or a sales specialist or whatever...and I still use toilet paper, not a bathroom tissue. I don't use a "sleep system", I use a bed. People have been duped into believing their conditions will improve if they change the name of it. Bullsht.

I digress. I am not advocating racism or bigotry. I am neither. All I am saying is I want to KNOW how a person really feels, and deal with it. The dishonesty is not helping anything. The fakeness is intoxicating. As much as I hate racism or homophobia, I would rather have a conversation with the person who is one. Ask him. Discuss with him. Not having the right to express yourself is unnatural and painful,no matter how idiotic your opinions or beliefs might be. Everyone wants to be heard.

Of course, I am talking about opinions. Not actions. Hurting someone is not an opinion anymore. The optimist in me thinks if this person did not have to bottle up his feelings all his life, maybe he was not going to resort to violence. You don't like gay people? Ok, why? What bothers you about two adults having a private relationship that has nothing to do with you? I want to know. Is it on religious grounds, is it your understanding of what morals should be? What is it? If we don't talk, I will not understand it. Once I see where you are coming from, I will still disagree with you but at least we talked. You go your way, I go mine. As a society we have chosen not to talk about these issues. Do they go away when we don't talk about them?

A lot of what I said can be misunderstood, so I want to make it clear: I hate racism, bigotry and homophobia with every fiber of my being. But I also hate an individuals right to speak out his opinions be taken from him because of political correctness ,no matter how idiotic or backwards it might be, and as long as they are opinions, not hurtful actions.

This is what I am struggling with.