- Joined
- Apr 15, 2013
- Messages
- 3,573
- Reactions
- 1,257
- Points
- 113
When I was younger, I used to think I was born ten years too late and did not get to enjoy the Sixties (Vatican Two, The Beatles, Elvis (still), The Band and Dylan, Jimi Hendrix, the birth of NASA, more Cold War fun, ban the bra and whatnot), then as I grew older, I thought maybe the Fifties would have been the best era to enjoy (pre-Vatican II, Elvis, the Everly Brothers, Jo Stafford (leftover from the Forties), Beatniks, serious Cold War issues, prosperity in post-WWII USA, birth of rock and roll and Brando, etc). Then, it occurred to me that the Roarin' Twenties (assuming I was "in" and could enter the speakeasies) might have been the epoch (Faulkner, Hemingway, Pound, Frost, dixieland jazz and Satchmo in his prime, and living with hope after the War to End All Wars). How about going back to the time of cavemen or ancient times in the Fertile Crescent--maybe meet the nomad Abram before he became the Patriarch of three monotheistic religions. Living during the Greek or Roman eras--or the time of Christ? Tough to call really.
Now, I just don't know. Go back to far and your life expectancy would have been less than I am now, maybe only 45 years. Even so, I think it is an interesting question. Does anybody have any strong feeling on which epoch in human history you would have loved to live in? Floor's wide open.
Now, I just don't know. Go back to far and your life expectancy would have been less than I am now, maybe only 45 years. Even so, I think it is an interesting question. Does anybody have any strong feeling on which epoch in human history you would have loved to live in? Floor's wide open.