Draw now wide open for Federer to reel in #18....

[calitennis127]

All he has to do is beat Murray and then play two solid matches after that, and he's got it. Clearly the toughest obstacle at this tournament for him has just been removed with Djokovic falling to Wawrinka.

Are all you fellow Federer fans as excited as I am by this opportunity?:clap

 

[Front242]

If he was 26/27, yes. Since he's 32...no.

 

[brokenshoelace]

...T

 

[brokenshoelace]

...R

 

[brokenshoelace]

...O

 

[brokenshoelace]

...L

 

[brokenshoelace]

....L

 

[shawnbm]

LOL Broken--that is the funniest thing in weeks around here!

 

[calitennis127]

Broken Shoelace - humorless.

 

[Murat Baslamisli]

I feel like I am in a cheerleading squad..."Give me a T" "Teeeeeeeeeee"

 

[brokenshoelace]

Broken Shoelace - humorless.

Not really. I was just going along with the flow of the thread. If I were humorless I would have taken the statement seriously.

 

[ftan]

Well I would have agreed with you..but there is this bloke called 'Rafael Nadal' he has to deal with first

 

[calitennis127]

The problem with Broken is that he is so dimwitted and corny about the Federer-Nadal series that he really thinks that Nadal has been in control of the matches and that they are his to lose as much as they are Federer's to win.

Shear cluelessness.

Also, out of curiosity, what was the winner count in the Nishikori match? 60 to 26 for Nishikori? I'm just asking because I honestly don't know. I'm just making an informed guess based on scores and scores of Nadal matches over the years.

 

[calitennis127]

Broken is also an outright hypocrite. He calls people trolls when they don't say the most predictable things, but no one responds to those kinds of posts as consistently on a daily and weekly basis as him. Nobody does.

So here he is condemning supposedly outlandish posts, while continuing his 5-year-long pattern of constantly responding to them, literally every day of the year.

Add to that his total misunderstanding of so much that he watches in tennis, and you have a rather notable bonehead on your hands.

 

[brokenshoelace]

Broken is also an outright hypocrite. He calls people trolls when they don't say the most predictable things, but no one responds to those kinds of posts as consistently on a daily and weekly basis as him. Nobody does.

So here he is condemning supposedly outlandish posts, while continuing his 5-year-long pattern of constantly responding to them, literally every day of the year.

Add to that his total misunderstanding of so much that he watches in tennis, and you have a rather notable bonehead on your hands.

LOL, somebody forgot to take his medication. Either that or you've been hitting the Jack Daniels bottle hard.

 

[brokenshoelace]

Also, out of curiosity, what was the winner count in the Nishikori match? 60 to 26 for Nishikori? I'm just asking because I honestly don't know. I'm just making an informed guess based on scores and scores of Nadal matches over the years.

They were tied 36 apiece. Yup, "informed" guess indeed. You need to start using Google.

 

[calitennis127]

Broken is also an outright hypocrite. He calls people trolls when they don't say the most predictable things, but no one responds to those kinds of posts as consistently on a daily and weekly basis as him. Nobody does.

So here he is condemning supposedly outlandish posts, while continuing his 5-year-long pattern of constantly responding to them, literally every day of the year.

Add to that his total misunderstanding of so much that he watches in tennis, and you have a rather notable bonehead on your hands.

LOL, somebody forgot to take his medication. Either that or you've been hitting the Jack Daniels bottle hard.

LOL....respond to what I said. No one follows the posts of board rebels more religiously than you do. The way you chased Nadal2005 or whatever his name was is case and point. It was pitiful. And everyone who has been on this board for a while knows that what I am saying is true.

 

[calitennis127]

Also, out of curiosity, what was the winner count in the Nishikori match? 60 to 26 for Nishikori? I'm just asking because I honestly don't know. I'm just making an informed guess based on scores and scores of Nadal matches over the years.

They were tied 36 apiece. Yup, "informed" guess indeed. You need to start using Google.

36 apiece against little Kei Nishikori? Wow, what a shot maker Nadal is.

 

[sid]

I feel like I am in a cheerleading squad..."Give me a T" "Teeeeeeeeeee"

cheerleading squad..."Give me A or M :laydownlaughing

 

[the AntiPusher]

Broken is also an outright hypocrite. He calls people trolls when they don't say the most predictable things, but no one responds to those kinds of posts as consistently on a daily and weekly basis as him. Nobody does.

So here he is condemning supposedly outlandish posts, while continuing his 5-year-long pattern of constantly responding to them, literally every day of the year.

Add to that his total misunderstanding of so much that he watches in tennis, and you have a rather notable bonehead on your hands.

LOL, somebody forgot to take his medication. Either that or you've been hitting the Jack Daniels bottle hard.

LOL....respond to what I said. No one follows the posts of board rebels more religiously than you do. The way you chased Nadal2005 or whatever his name was is case and point. It was pitiful. And everyone who has been on this board for a while knows that what I am saying is true.

Where is the poster Nadal2005