- Joined
- Aug 8, 2013
- Messages
- 1,417
- Reactions
- 172
- Points
- 63
Everyone in tennis is struck by how the younger #NEXTGEN players have struggled so mightily to make inroads into the ATP Elite pantheon – and marveled at how the older players continue to improve and maintain their dominant ways.
While players like Federer, Nadal, Karlovic, Muller, Wawrinka, Estrella Burgos, Robredo, Haas, Ramirez-Hidalgo, Youzhny, Djokovic, continue to enjoy success on the ATP Tour into their thirties, the youth brigade has been forced to suffer and scrap and fight for every single match win.
Tennis used to be a young man’s game but not anymore. The power elite of tennis are all over the age of 30. And the predicted youth rebellion continues to exercise their collective patience, waiting and striving and pushing and pressing to overthrow The Five Kings.
There has to be a reason for this strange change in the tennis universe. Could it be rooted in the examples of Jimmy Connors and Andre Agassi? Specifically Connors’ historic run to the US Open semifinal at age 39 and Agassi’s consistent elite results all the way into his mid thirties.
Is it possible that these two aged pioneers forever altered the power structure of tennis and shifted the balance to older veteran players and from the young up and comers?
Recall the days when the top ten featured mostly younger players. The top five in May 2002 was 1 Hewitt (age 21), 2 Haas (24), 3 Agassi (32), 4 Kafelnikov (28), 5 Safin (22).
So could there be any other explanation for this shift? Could it be that the players love to play tennis more today? Could it be connected to more serious fitness regimens and nutritional programs? Or is it all just a big coincidence?
While players like Federer, Nadal, Karlovic, Muller, Wawrinka, Estrella Burgos, Robredo, Haas, Ramirez-Hidalgo, Youzhny, Djokovic, continue to enjoy success on the ATP Tour into their thirties, the youth brigade has been forced to suffer and scrap and fight for every single match win.
Tennis used to be a young man’s game but not anymore. The power elite of tennis are all over the age of 30. And the predicted youth rebellion continues to exercise their collective patience, waiting and striving and pushing and pressing to overthrow The Five Kings.
There has to be a reason for this strange change in the tennis universe. Could it be rooted in the examples of Jimmy Connors and Andre Agassi? Specifically Connors’ historic run to the US Open semifinal at age 39 and Agassi’s consistent elite results all the way into his mid thirties.
Is it possible that these two aged pioneers forever altered the power structure of tennis and shifted the balance to older veteran players and from the young up and comers?
Recall the days when the top ten featured mostly younger players. The top five in May 2002 was 1 Hewitt (age 21), 2 Haas (24), 3 Agassi (32), 4 Kafelnikov (28), 5 Safin (22).
So could there be any other explanation for this shift? Could it be that the players love to play tennis more today? Could it be connected to more serious fitness regimens and nutritional programs? Or is it all just a big coincidence?