- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 10,324
- Reactions
- 6,090
- Points
- 113
Over at Tennis Frontier I was updating a chart I made to contextualize title winners by generation, and just to keep track of results. Here is the updated version, through June (I know Antalya and Eastbourne are just starting, but...)
Now here's a comparison of 2016 through the same point:
As you can see, this year has been far more diverse in terms of generational titles. Last year the 1984-88 group was very dominant, mainly due to Novak but also some Nadal and Murray sprinkled in. The "Lost Generation" (1989-93) had a presence, but the old guys (1979-83) were fading and NextGen (1994-98) hadn't really established itself.
The big difference this year in terms of generations is, obviously, the resurgence of Federer, but also the rise of both younger generations. The 1984-88 group is still the most dominant, but only by an edge over the old guys.
Anyhow, what an interesting year it has been.
Now here's a comparison of 2016 through the same point:
As you can see, this year has been far more diverse in terms of generational titles. Last year the 1984-88 group was very dominant, mainly due to Novak but also some Nadal and Murray sprinkled in. The "Lost Generation" (1989-93) had a presence, but the old guys (1979-83) were fading and NextGen (1994-98) hadn't really established itself.
The big difference this year in terms of generations is, obviously, the resurgence of Federer, but also the rise of both younger generations. The 1984-88 group is still the most dominant, but only by an edge over the old guys.
Anyhow, what an interesting year it has been.