Another Look at Big Three Hegemony

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,273
Reactions
6,014
Points
113
I won't say much except by way of explanation, but let the graphics do my talking.

BIG THREE TITLES: 2001-24

Screenshot 2025-01-11 at 10.31.29 AM.png


Now compare:

BIG TITLES BY OTHER PLAYERS, 2001-24:

Screenshot 2025-01-11 at 10.34.47 AM.png


The only thing I'll explain for the above is that single big title winners are in light grey, while players who won multiple big titles have a color (e.g. you can see Andy Murray in the lightish green in the middle, as the clearly most dominant non-Big Three player during the era).

Last one (or two-in-one) - a somewhat simplified version.

Screenshot 2025-01-11 at 10.35.40 AM.png

The above are big titles only.

A couple spare notes:

  • The Big Three have won a big title every year going back to 2002, or 23 years in a row.
  • 2024 was the first year since 2002 that one of the Big Three didn't win a Slam, or a span of 21 years.
  • At least two of the three won Big Titles in every year from 2005-22.
  • All three won big titles in every year from 2007-12, then again in 2014, and 2018-19.
  • 2011 was the peak of the "hegemony," but really they were dominant from 2004 to 23.
  • Carlos Alcaraz, shortly followed by Jannik Sinner, became the first non-Big Three player(s) to win multiple Grand Slams in a year in the 21st century, or since Andre Agassi in 1999.
 
Last edited: